Timeline for It feels bad to be on the receiving end of a closed question
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 23, 2017 at 12:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://unix.stackexchange.com/ with https://unix.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Feb 2, 2013 at 2:47 | comment | added | user50049 | @GeorgeStocker Oh now this is nice, I removed the wiki status of the second, and there's no trace of when it was applied and when it was removed, but I think you're correct - he would not have noticed the second. My bad :) | |
Feb 2, 2013 at 2:43 | comment | added | George Stocker Mod | @TimPost But that only shows posts that he's gotten reputation for, right? If he hasn't gotten any reputation on it in a while, it'd be hard to find, wouldn't it? | |
Feb 2, 2013 at 2:41 | comment | added | user50049 | @GeorgeStocker Actually, he could, by clicking 'show deleted' on the reputation history tab, but that would take some work. | |
Feb 2, 2013 at 2:35 | comment | added | George Stocker Mod | @waffles imagine if it was deleted? You'd never be able to see it again without knowing what the PostID was or searching through the data dump. | |
Feb 2, 2013 at 2:03 | history | edited | waffles | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 37 characters in body
|
Feb 2, 2013 at 1:55 | answer | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | timeline score: 5 | |
Feb 2, 2013 at 1:42 | history | edited | Shog9Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fix weird link to revision history, note migration of other
|
Feb 2, 2013 at 1:29 | comment | added | user50049 | @UphillLuge Nothing in Sam's post indicates that he's not grateful for the help he received here. He interacted with the system, it left a bad taste in his mouth in these instances and he felt that it was worth discussing. This is not unlike almost every other discussion surrounding a question closure. Would you say the same thing on all of those, or are you a little more concerned with who raised the discussion than the discussion itself? | |
Feb 2, 2013 at 1:29 | comment | added | waffles | @UphillLuge I am trying to make stuff better, I could have just moved along and not mentioned anything. I don't even have a prescriptive solution for the problem. | |
Feb 2, 2013 at 1:19 | answer | added | user50049 | timeline score: 10 | |
Feb 2, 2013 at 0:49 | comment | added | Mysticial | On top of that, not everybody recognizes you as a former dev with full moderator powers... | |
Feb 2, 2013 at 0:42 | answer | added | Caffeinated | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 2, 2013 at 0:28 | history | asked | waffles | CC BY-SA 3.0 |