Timeline for How to handle questions whose answers could have dubious legal/moral applications [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Feb 13, 2013 at 16:36 | history | closed |
Joachim Sauer BinaryMisfit ChrisFMod Himanshu user200500 |
exact duplicate | |
| Feb 13, 2013 at 16:24 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 13, 2013 at 16:39 | |||||
| Feb 13, 2013 at 16:11 | answer | added | user50049 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 13, 2013 at 16:03 | history | edited | Robert Ryan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Change link to original question rather than my deleted answer
|
| Feb 13, 2013 at 15:58 | answer | added | Martijn Pieters | timeline score: 8 | |
| Feb 13, 2013 at 15:56 | comment | added | Martijn Pieters | SE cannot police each and every law or moral code or private agreement out there. So we don't. | |
| Feb 13, 2013 at 15:54 | answer | added | Dave Newton | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 13, 2013 at 15:53 | comment | added | Joachim Sauer | Apart from dubious moral values, that question is abysmal in its grammar. There seems to be some actual technical know-how, but I can't understand a sentence he writes without reading it three times. | |
| Feb 13, 2013 at 15:52 | comment | added | Mysticial | Oh come on. Copying a video? Seriously?!?! That's nothing compared to something like this: stackoverflow.com/questions/3905734/… | |
| Feb 13, 2013 at 15:50 | history | asked | Robert Ryan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |