7 replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
source | link

This auditThis audit is just flat out stupid. It is a valid answer with a code example and good reasoning, although it may not be the right one from a technical perspective, but: THAT IS NOT THE POINT OF REVIEWING. Reviewing is about catching the awful answers, the ones with awful formattning, the ones that aren't real answers. This answer was fair, although maybe incorrect. Again, that doesn't matter – this question was vague and the answer all right in style, validity and from any reviewing perspective.

I'm getting real tired of these stupid audits (all right, some are fine, this one – and a lot of others aren't). I have complained previously, and I will continue to complain until something is done about it.

Fix the audit system, or at least make audits fair, not like this one.

This audit is just flat out stupid. It is a valid answer with a code example and good reasoning, although it may not be the right one from a technical perspective, but: THAT IS NOT THE POINT OF REVIEWING. Reviewing is about catching the awful answers, the ones with awful formattning, the ones that aren't real answers. This answer was fair, although maybe incorrect. Again, that doesn't matter – this question was vague and the answer all right in style, validity and from any reviewing perspective.

I'm getting real tired of these stupid audits (all right, some are fine, this one – and a lot of others aren't). I have complained previously, and I will continue to complain until something is done about it.

Fix the audit system, or at least make audits fair, not like this one.

This audit is just flat out stupid. It is a valid answer with a code example and good reasoning, although it may not be the right one from a technical perspective, but: THAT IS NOT THE POINT OF REVIEWING. Reviewing is about catching the awful answers, the ones with awful formattning, the ones that aren't real answers. This answer was fair, although maybe incorrect. Again, that doesn't matter – this question was vague and the answer all right in style, validity and from any reviewing perspective.

I'm getting real tired of these stupid audits (all right, some are fine, this one – and a lot of others aren't). I have complained previously, and I will continue to complain until something is done about it.

Fix the audit system, or at least make audits fair, not like this one.

6 replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
source | link

This audit is just flat out stupid. It is a valid answer with a code example and good reasoning, although it may not be the right one from a technical perspective, but: THAT IS NOT THE POINT OF REVIEWING. Reviewing is about catching the awful answers, the ones with awful formattning, the ones that aren't real answers. This answer was fair, although maybe incorrect. Again, that doesn't matter – this question was vague and the answer all right in style, validity and from any reviewing perspective.

I'm getting real tired of these stupid audits (all right, some are fine, this one – and a lot of others aren't). I have complained previouslycomplained previously, and I will continue to complain until something is done about it.

Fix the audit system, or at least make audits fair, not like this one.

This audit is just flat out stupid. It is a valid answer with a code example and good reasoning, although it may not be the right one from a technical perspective, but: THAT IS NOT THE POINT OF REVIEWING. Reviewing is about catching the awful answers, the ones with awful formattning, the ones that aren't real answers. This answer was fair, although maybe incorrect. Again, that doesn't matter – this question was vague and the answer all right in style, validity and from any reviewing perspective.

I'm getting real tired of these stupid audits (all right, some are fine, this one – and a lot of others aren't). I have complained previously, and I will continue to complain until something is done about it.

Fix the audit system, or at least make audits fair, not like this one.

This audit is just flat out stupid. It is a valid answer with a code example and good reasoning, although it may not be the right one from a technical perspective, but: THAT IS NOT THE POINT OF REVIEWING. Reviewing is about catching the awful answers, the ones with awful formattning, the ones that aren't real answers. This answer was fair, although maybe incorrect. Again, that doesn't matter – this question was vague and the answer all right in style, validity and from any reviewing perspective.

I'm getting real tired of these stupid audits (all right, some are fine, this one – and a lot of others aren't). I have complained previously, and I will continue to complain until something is done about it.

Fix the audit system, or at least make audits fair, not like this one.

5 Migration of MSO links to MSE links
source | link

This audit is just flat out stupid. It is a valid answer with a code example and good reasoning, although it may not be the right one from a technical perspective, but: THAT IS NOT THE POINT OF REVIEWING. Reviewing is about catching the awful answers, the ones with awful formattning, the ones that aren't real answers. This answer was fair, although maybe incorrect. Again, that doesn't matter – this question was vague and the answer all right in style, validity and from any reviewing perspective.

I'm getting real tired of these stupid audits (all right, some are fine, this one – and a lot of others aren't). I have complained previouslycomplained previously, and I will continue to complain until something is done about it.

Fix the audit system, or at least make audits fair, not like this one.

This audit is just flat out stupid. It is a valid answer with a code example and good reasoning, although it may not be the right one from a technical perspective, but: THAT IS NOT THE POINT OF REVIEWING. Reviewing is about catching the awful answers, the ones with awful formattning, the ones that aren't real answers. This answer was fair, although maybe incorrect. Again, that doesn't matter – this question was vague and the answer all right in style, validity and from any reviewing perspective.

I'm getting real tired of these stupid audits (all right, some are fine, this one – and a lot of others aren't). I have complained previously, and I will continue to complain until something is done about it.

Fix the audit system, or at least make audits fair, not like this one.

This audit is just flat out stupid. It is a valid answer with a code example and good reasoning, although it may not be the right one from a technical perspective, but: THAT IS NOT THE POINT OF REVIEWING. Reviewing is about catching the awful answers, the ones with awful formattning, the ones that aren't real answers. This answer was fair, although maybe incorrect. Again, that doesn't matter – this question was vague and the answer all right in style, validity and from any reviewing perspective.

I'm getting real tired of these stupid audits (all right, some are fine, this one – and a lot of others aren't). I have complained previously, and I will continue to complain until something is done about it.

Fix the audit system, or at least make audits fair, not like this one.

4 edited tags
| link
3 added 1 characters in body
source | link
2 added 222 characters in body
source | link
1
source | link