Timeline for More descriptive "User was removed" explanation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 9:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Apr 24, 2014 at 18:05 | comment | added | Kuba hasn't forgotten Monica | I second this. Moreover, I think that reputation should not be taken away simply because a user was removed, unless that user's removal was irregular voting (shill votes etc.). Just because someone was a jerk in unrelated ways doesn't make my question or answer any less useful. | |
| Apr 24, 2014 at 13:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Mar 26, 2013 at 18:55 | history | answered | Jeremy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |