Skip to main content
26 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 18, 2021 at 11:45 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://blog.stackoverflow.com with https://blog.stackoverflow.com
Mar 13, 2020 at 7:18 answer added PolyGeo timeline score: 5
Jan 22, 2018 at 7:53 history edited Shadow Wizard
edited tags
Jan 22, 2018 at 4:22 history edited curiousdannii
edited tags
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
S Mar 7, 2016 at 1:16 history suggested Rand al'Thor CC BY-SA 3.0
correcting a couple of typos
Mar 7, 2016 at 0:09 review Suggested edits
S Mar 7, 2016 at 1:16
Apr 24, 2014 at 13:45 history edited CommunityBot
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Jan 30, 2014 at 17:55 vote accept Jon Ericson
Apr 23, 2013 at 17:55 answer added Jon Ericson timeline score: 15
Apr 23, 2013 at 3:24 review Suggested edits
Apr 23, 2013 at 3:35
Apr 23, 2013 at 3:10 comment added Troyen @Troyen My experience is primarily from JLU, which is still in beta, and we've had this very problem since the beginning. I believe something similar happened to the History beta and a couple others as well. I agree with your POV, I'm just saying that view might not be very prevalent because there aren't many resources for brand new betas.
Apr 23, 2013 at 3:00 answer added Shog9 timeline score: 76
Apr 23, 2013 at 2:10 answer added Rosinante timeline score: 5
Apr 22, 2013 at 23:53 comment added yannis @Troyen Took a quick look at your profile, and you seem to be primarily active on graduate sites. I'm talking about a beta site here, which means the community has a very different set of challenges to overcome. Personally I'd probably ignore a near even split on Programmers (graduate), true. On Politics (young beta) however if there was an even split I'd be much more inclined to support a scope expansion, as it would be the more beneficial option for the current state of the site.
Apr 22, 2013 at 23:45 comment added Troyen @Yannis But that's not what often happens (in my experience, it seems the status-quo remains in effect on a near-even split), hence this discussion. There aren't a lot of resources that recommend how to set up a brand new site and handle cases like that aside from some brief sections in the SE FAQ.
Apr 22, 2013 at 22:52 comment added yannis @Troyen The quality of arguments brought forth for or against the scope expansion will be more important for Politics, than the actual voting split. Young betas don't see much Meta activity, you can't really rely on vote splits, especially when they are so close. Also, since the site is in beta, it almost always makes sense to go for a scope expansion, even if the vote is 50/50. Betas can always use more questions...
Apr 22, 2013 at 22:47 comment added Troyen @Yannis If someone proposes a scope expansion on Politics and the vote is 60/40 in favor, are those topics under the proposed site expansion now on-topic, or was that not enough of a "consensus"? How about 70/30?
Apr 22, 2013 at 22:47 answer added random timeline score: 9
Apr 22, 2013 at 22:44 history edited Jon Ericson CC BY-SA 3.0
Sigh. I'm no longer sure that even splitting MSO from MSE would help. It's just so cynical around here.
Apr 22, 2013 at 22:40 comment added yannis @JonEricson "no generalizations can be made across multiple sites" is also my interpretation of random's comment, and also my own opinion. If I start moderating Politics as I moderate Programmers, Politics will soon cease to exist.
Apr 22, 2013 at 22:29 comment added random It's like government (SE) vs your book club (scope & conventions of a site)
Apr 22, 2013 at 21:46 answer added Sam I am says Reinstate Monica timeline score: 30
Apr 22, 2013 at 21:46 history edited Jon Ericson CC BY-SA 3.0
A short note on the unique situation of beta sites.
Apr 22, 2013 at 21:30 comment added user164207 The Stack Exchange network of sites do not operate on consensus.
Apr 22, 2013 at 21:27 history asked Jon Ericson CC BY-SA 3.0