Timeline for The robo-approvers are killing my will to review edits
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Aug 12, 2013 at 15:01 | comment | added | JoshDM | I just reviewed some SEs and can see why I'm faster there than on FPs; some SE rejects are obvious, while FPs definitely need more editing involvement. I admit I'm a badge hunter and hungry for items from those lesser queues (LQPs and LAs), but I think some form of a presentation delay (in conjunction with the button delay), possibly skewed based the type of review presented (45 seconds for a FP, 20 seconds for a SE), will add some semblance of fairness between those who automate and those who participate. I'm a victim of incentives, but I want to get there fairly. | |
| Aug 12, 2013 at 14:58 | history | undeleted | Adam LearStaffMod | ||
| Jul 11, 2013 at 3:58 | history | deleted | JoshDM | via Vote | |
| Jun 14, 2013 at 16:28 | history | edited | JoshDM | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 298 characters in body
|
| Jun 14, 2013 at 16:16 | comment | added | Shog9 | Heh... Well, we specifically track review times in order to watch for signs of abuse, @Antony. Very fast reviewers find themselves held to a higher standard when it comes to audits and such. Also: other things we're learning from watching you... | |
| Jun 14, 2013 at 16:14 | comment | added | Antony | @Shog9 With your detailed account of a user's activity, now I wonder what SE doesn't know about me. | |
| Jun 14, 2013 at 16:13 | comment | added | Shog9 | Yes it does, @Josh. | |
| Jun 14, 2013 at 16:13 | comment | added | JoshDM | @Shog9 - does that average count the times when I edit the items in the queue, and the amount of time spent editing? Because I edit when I can. I've got an outstanding beef here where you get kicked out of the review queue for editing and re-editing items. | |
| Jun 14, 2013 at 16:11 | comment | added | Shog9 | Just so you know, your average review time is well under 1 minute. You spend the most time reviewing first posts (kudos) averaging 61 seconds per review - but in the queue where you're most active (edits), you average a hair under 26 seconds. | |
| Jun 14, 2013 at 16:10 | comment | added | Servy | Note there is already a delay when reviewing edits. The approve/reject buttons aren't enabled for several seconds. | |
| Jun 14, 2013 at 16:07 | history | edited | JoshDM | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 101 characters in body
|
| Jun 14, 2013 at 16:01 | comment | added | JoshDM | It doesn't have to be a full minute, just something ANYTHING to prevent 20 reviews being performed in under 2 minutes. | |
| Jun 14, 2013 at 16:01 | comment | added | Servy | It has been shown on a lot of occasions that the quality of reviews has very little correlation with reputation. If it did, the problem would be easy to solve (just raise the rep requirement to review, or otherwise be more restrictive to lower rep users). The problem is lots of high rep users are bad reviewers, and plenty of not-so-high rep users are good reviewers. | |
| Jun 14, 2013 at 15:59 | comment | added | JoshDM | Which is why the penalty reduces with higher reputations. | |
| Jun 14, 2013 at 15:59 | history | edited | JoshDM | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 303 characters in body
|
| Jun 14, 2013 at 15:58 | comment | added | Servy | And that will be very annoying and disruptive for people reviewing properly. We don't want that. We want to be annoying and disruptive for people not reviewing properly but while not affecting, or only minimally affecting, people reviewing properly. | |
| Jun 14, 2013 at 15:55 | comment | added | JoshDM | I never said to force anyone to review an item for a minute. They can take a second to review. Just like I can't post another comment until X seconds pass, reviewers who have been presented with an item less than 1 minute ago won't be able to view another item to review (FROM ANY QUEUE) until that minute passes. | |
| Jun 14, 2013 at 15:53 | comment | added | Servy | Even if someone is taking a lot of time to review properly, there will still be a noticable percentage of reviews that take less than a minute. Even if a fair number of reviews should be that long or longer, not all need to be. | |
| Jun 14, 2013 at 15:51 | history | answered | JoshDM | CC BY-SA 3.0 |