Timeline for Don't index closed questions (non-duplicate) for search engines
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 18, 2013 at 21:38 | comment | added | psubsee2003 | @benisuǝqbackwards however, I can see the argument. But I don't think there is a good solution. Including posts that have upvoted comments increases the likelihood of getting questions with variants of the "what have you tried" comments indexed. And frankly, I'd rather err on the side of fewer indexed questions to help limit the crap. | |
Aug 18, 2013 at 21:28 | comment | added | psubsee2003 | @benisuǝqbackwards for someone experienced with SO/SE, I would say yes, but if I was a brand new user, stumbled in via google to a post that had no answers and only a few comments, I would probably glance and move on. | |
Aug 18, 2013 at 21:24 | comment | added | ben is uǝq backwards | The standard rationale for not deleting these posts is that there might be something useful in the comments and this is often true - normally some version of "Why!!! Please don't! Noooooo!" but it can be something more technical. Doesn't the same rationale fit for this situation? | |
Aug 18, 2013 at 21:20 | history | answered | psubsee2003 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |