I say it's spam. I would be reluctant to accept third party links in general. Otherwise tag wikis will end up as big link directories.

The site in question seems non-commercial for now, but that doesn't mean it's not spam. It looks like a github crawler without much useful content. The disclaimer seems to indicates the users good intent but that could also have been the intention of including it. The link seems kind of promotional.

Both tag wikis already link to their official documentation with many example. I see no reason to link to other external sites, unless 'Sourcegraph' is something well known and accepted in the those frameworks' communities (which I guess it's not). Should they link from every tag wiki to their site just because they indexed some random code snippets from github? Of course not.

I say it's spam. I would be reluctant to accept third party links in general. Otherwise tag wikis will end up as big link directories.

The site in question seems non-commercial for now, but that doesn't mean it's not spam. It looks like a github crawler without much useful content. The disclaimer seems to indicate the users good intent - but that could also have been the intention of including it. The link seems kind of promotional.

Both tag wikis already link to their official documentations with many examples. I see no reason to link to other external sites, unless 'Sourcegraph' is something well known and accepted in the those frameworks' communities (which I guess it's not). Should sourcegraph link from every tag wiki to their site just because they indexed some random code snippets from github? Of course not.