2 deleted 7 characters in body
source | link

On posts with a positive score, the very low quality flag option isn't enabled. This is great for many instances - if a post is +7, it's most likely high quality. We don't want unexperienced users flagging those.

However, this brings with it a problem when flagging link-only answers. Relatively often, an LOA (linka link-only answer) will have a positive score - the link is useful. If the score is just +1, I downvote it, flag, and move on. If it's +2 or above, though, I'm kinda stuck.

I could use a custom flag, but 10kers don't get to see those - meaning the mod workload just got that much heavier. I could flag it as NAA, but it is an answer. It's just very low quality.

So, I propose that the VLQ flag option be reneenabled on positively-voted posts for users with x helpful flags - maybe 500? 1000? 50? The details can be worked out.

Opinions? Huge, gaping holes in my reasoning?

On posts with a positive score, the very low quality flag option isn't enabled. This is great for many instances - if a post is +7, it's most likely high quality. We don't want unexperienced users flagging those.

However, this brings with it a problem when flagging link-only answers. Relatively often, an LOA (link-only answer) will have a positive score - the link is useful. If the score is just +1, I downvote it, flag, and move on. If it's +2 or above, though, I'm kinda stuck.

I could use a custom flag, but 10kers don't get to see those - meaning the mod workload just got that much heavier. I could flag it as NAA, but it is an answer. It's just very low quality.

So, I propose that the VLQ flag option be reneenabled on positively-voted posts for users with x helpful flags - maybe 500? 1000? 50? The details can be worked out.

Opinions? Huge, gaping holes in my reasoning?

On posts with a positive score, the very low quality flag option isn't enabled. This is great for many instances - if a post is +7, it's most likely high quality. We don't want unexperienced users flagging those.

However, this brings with it a problem when flagging link-only answers. Relatively often, a link-only answer will have a positive score - the link is useful. If the score is just +1, I downvote it, flag, and move on. If it's +2 or above, though, I'm kinda stuck.

I could use a custom flag, but 10kers don't get to see those - meaning the mod workload just got that much heavier. I could flag it as NAA, but it is an answer. It's just very low quality.

So, I propose that the VLQ flag option be reneenabled on positively-voted posts for users with x helpful flags - maybe 500? 1000? 50? The details can be worked out.

Opinions? Huge, gaping holes in my reasoning?

1
source | link

Enable the VLQ flag option on upvoted posts for users with good flagging history

On posts with a positive score, the very low quality flag option isn't enabled. This is great for many instances - if a post is +7, it's most likely high quality. We don't want unexperienced users flagging those.

However, this brings with it a problem when flagging link-only answers. Relatively often, an LOA (link-only answer) will have a positive score - the link is useful. If the score is just +1, I downvote it, flag, and move on. If it's +2 or above, though, I'm kinda stuck.

I could use a custom flag, but 10kers don't get to see those - meaning the mod workload just got that much heavier. I could flag it as NAA, but it is an answer. It's just very low quality.

So, I propose that the VLQ flag option be reneenabled on positively-voted posts for users with x helpful flags - maybe 500? 1000? 50? The details can be worked out.

Opinions? Huge, gaping holes in my reasoning?