Timeline for Bring back review numbers to the top bar
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
36 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2013 at 0:45 | history | edited | LauraStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| S Dec 18, 2013 at 21:29 | history | bounty ended | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | ||
| S Dec 18, 2013 at 21:29 | history | notice removed | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | ||
| Dec 18, 2013 at 16:38 | answer | added | Stephen Ostermiller | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 18, 2013 at 14:52 | history | edited | LauraStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 17, 2013 at 22:15 | vote | accept | James Webster | ||
| Dec 17, 2013 at 22:15 | answer | added | LauraStaffMod | timeline score: 31 | |
| Dec 16, 2013 at 18:32 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @Laura yep know this, whenever I checked there were less than five suggested edits in the queue so I was hoping they too will appear. Why not next to the flag count, with different color? There's still room for this, except maybe users like Jon Skeet. :) | |
| Dec 16, 2013 at 18:12 | comment | added | Laura StaffMod | @ShaWizDowArd The number you see back in the top bar is not the suggested edit count; it's the 10k flag count (which we had accidentally forgotten to include when the new top bar rolled out; I hope this is clear when you actually click on it). We're still discussing the best way to handle suggested edit notifications. | |
| Dec 16, 2013 at 11:36 | vote | accept | James Webster | ||
| Dec 17, 2013 at 22:15 | |||||
| Dec 16, 2013 at 8:48 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @JeremyTunnell I see it's done, cheers! Any different logic behind the scenes, or is it exactly like it was before? | |
| Dec 13, 2013 at 16:48 | comment | added | Jeremy T StaffMod | @Gilles We are still looking at this. Don't want to make a hasty decision. We're going to do something, but I want to make sure that we don't have any better options than rolling back. | |
| Dec 11, 2013 at 23:03 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | @JeremyTunnell The data shows that our concerns were warranted. Suggested edits are now taking a lot longer to be reviewed. Please bring the suggested edit indicator back. | |
| S Dec 11, 2013 at 23:02 | history | bounty started | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | ||
| S Dec 11, 2013 at 23:02 | history | notice added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | Draw attention | |
| Dec 11, 2013 at 8:45 | history | edited | James Webster | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Dec 8, 2013 at 14:30 | comment | added | Kerrek SB | Just to chime in: I know what those indicators are, but I too needed them to remember to do reviews. I would just literally forget that reviews exist if it weren't for the occasional visual cue. I like doing them, but there's just nothing keeping them on my mind. | |
| Dec 8, 2013 at 12:52 | answer | added | Shadow Wizard | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 8, 2013 at 4:51 | comment | added | user213963 | Related - notify users of possible reviews on toolbar | |
| Dec 6, 2013 at 19:30 | comment | added | Jeremy T StaffMod | We are considering this and also some recommendations from the community team. Doesn't seem necessary to rush it. I'm going to let everybody working through next week. | |
| Dec 6, 2013 at 19:29 | history | edited | Jeremy TStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 6, 2013 at 8:35 | answer | added | Praveen | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 16:08 | answer | added | Undo | timeline score: 25 | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 9:13 | answer | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | timeline score: 56 | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 9:11 | history | edited | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
meaningful title and tags
|
| Dec 4, 2013 at 22:42 | comment | added | James Webster | @Cruncher Hah. I have 5 emails total. If they're junk or I'm finished with them, they're deleted. | |
| Dec 4, 2013 at 22:00 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | Review 101: the number to the right is amount of pending suggested edits you could review (2K+ rep) and the number to the left is amount of flags you could handle (flag/vote too or disagree with existing flags) in the 10K moderator tools. R.I.P, poor numbers. :) | |
| Dec 4, 2013 at 21:52 | comment | added | Cruncher | @JamesWebster I've had over 500 unread emails for a year now. I can live with little red numbers :) | |
| Dec 4, 2013 at 21:47 | comment | added | James Webster | @bluefeet and Cruncher. Because they're the only reason I visit the review page. It's the same reason I update the apps on my phone.. because I want to get rid of the stupid little red number. | |
| Dec 4, 2013 at 21:44 | comment | added | animuson StaffMod | @Servy Hmmm, that makes sense. Hard to notice that it's missing here on Meta since we don't get a lot of flags that can be seen by 10k users. I imagine they'd add the flag count back in, but to be honest I haven't really cared that the suggested edits count is missing, and I'd rather leave it that way. | |
| Dec 4, 2013 at 21:41 | comment | added | Servy | @animuson But before 10k users were shown the flag count as well; now we're not. | |
| Dec 4, 2013 at 21:41 | comment | added | ben is uǝq backwards | Thanks @animuson. I thought of a better solution anyway... you could just overlay the review link with the number of reviews to be done if you want. 100,289 should cover most of it ;-). | |
| Dec 4, 2013 at 21:37 | comment | added | animuson StaffMod | @ben The flag count for mods is to the left of our Gravatar now, along with a diamond which acts as a drop-down for mod messages: i.sstatic.net/emJ8Q.jpg | |
| Dec 4, 2013 at 21:34 | comment | added | Taryn | Why do you want it if you didn't understand it? | |
| Dec 4, 2013 at 21:34 | comment | added | Cruncher | You're requesting a feature, of something that has been removed that you didn't even understand? | |
| Dec 4, 2013 at 21:30 | history | asked | James Webster | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
