Timeline for Is Community Wiki fatally flawed XOR vitally useful?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2011 at 21:08 | answer | added | DrBeco | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 18, 2011 at 9:01 | answer | added | Jeff Atwood | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 18, 2011 at 8:59 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 18, 2011 at 8:59 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | @eryk it is now possible for moderators to un-wiki items; flag it for moderator attention and plead your case. | |
| Feb 20, 2011 at 8:50 | comment | added | Eryk Sun | I'm not obsessed with rep, but I can't fathom why edits would trigger this. Editing something repeatedly doesn't necessarily imply one needs community assistance. Certainly if I wanted help, I'd mark it wiki myself. | |
| Feb 20, 2011 at 8:43 | comment | added | Eryk Sun | I just learned about the edit threshold the hard way. I was working on a problem in my spare time between other problems over a couple of days, and posting improvements as I tweaked my answer. At least I got +8 before it went community wiki, but I feel like I'm being punished for caring about the quality of my work. | |
| Jul 20, 2010 at 8:19 | comment | added | matt wilkie | thank you for this. I came to SO after years of working in various wiki communities. Being a generous sort I dutifully marked every single question and answer I made 'community wiki'. Of course I want other people to contribute and make corrections! I then wandered and wondered for some time why I wasn't allowed to play yet, even the paltry 15 rep needed for commenting was out of reach. And then I'd be chastised for answering instead of commenting. It was quite discouraging and I almost gave up. Anyway, is CW useful? Yes, it has it purpose. Wiki? Definitely not. Not in name, not in substance. | |
| Sep 18, 2009 at 16:12 | answer | added | Paul Nathan | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 18, 2009 at 15:49 | answer | added | Brian Knoblauch | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 17, 2009 at 13:33 | vote | accept | ベレアー アダム | ||
| Sep 10, 2009 at 17:11 | answer | added | Robert Cartaino | timeline score: 12 | |
| Sep 10, 2009 at 15:13 | comment | added | ベレアー アダム | So then it's fatally useful? Or is it vitally flawed? Select at least three. | |
| Sep 10, 2009 at 14:56 | history | edited | Shog9 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
fixed typo, title -> question
|
| Sep 10, 2009 at 14:51 | answer | added | Shog9 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 10, 2009 at 14:49 | history | edited | Hilarious Comedy Pesto | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited title
|
| Sep 10, 2009 at 14:46 | comment | added | Joel Coehoorn Mod | Fatally flawed or vitally useful? Yes. | |
| Sep 10, 2009 at 14:40 | history | asked | ベレアー アダム | CC BY-SA 2.5 |