Timeline for Lock questions in the review queue while being reviewed
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:29 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 24, 2014 at 14:01 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Dec 26, 2013 at 10:25 | comment | added | gnat | @PompousQWoodger that's understandable: currrent approach essentially punishes those who prefer to put thinking into reviews. I'd be comfortable with 5-10 min, too. I probably could handle 3 min and maybe even 2, but having like 20-30 seconds to complete review as of now sucks. Just sucks | |
| Dec 26, 2013 at 10:24 | comment | added | Bill Woodger |
Here's an example: stackoverflow.com/review/suggested-edits/3665130 I got to this 20 seconds after proposed. Grammar not improved. Code-formatting not significantly improved (if something of that insignificance removed the scroll-bar, OK, otherwise...) Took about 10 seconds. Reject. Gets me Already approved, go do some more work on it.. I don't mind not getting the extra review-count, but I do mind others getting the credit whilst I just get to spend more time on it.
|
|
| Dec 26, 2013 at 10:08 | comment | added | Bill Woodger | I have basically stopped reviewing edits because of this (I did a few recently when the little counter started appearing). I think 5-10 minutes would be enough for the queues I have access to (<3k). | |
| Dec 26, 2013 at 7:08 | history | answered | gnat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |