3 Fixed (some) typos.
source | link

W3Fools is nothing more than thea rant against W3Schools. This site is just a collection of claims without any examples to prove them. For example they claim W3Schools to contain many outdated and/or wrong examples, but they provide no refrencesreferences to such 'bad' examples nor the correct solutions.

Because of that the comments linking to them are mostly unnecessary. Just flag comments that are not helpful. Banning that link does not make much sense, because people will find another thing to mess with.

When it comes to links to W3Schools, well, link-only answers are discouraged so the complete solution should be placed in answer and the link should be only back-reference. As long as the information is correct, it shouldn't matter from which resource it comes from.

W3Fools is nothing more than the rant against W3Schools. This site is just a collection of claims without any examples to prove them. For example they claim W3Schools to contain many outdated and/or wrong examples, but they provide no refrences to such 'bad' examples nor the correct solutions.

Because of that the comments linking to them are mostly unnecessary. Just flag comments that are not helpful. Banning that link does not make much sense, because people will find another thing to mess with.

When it comes to links to W3Schools, well, link-only answers are discouraged so the complete solution should be placed in answer and the link should be only back-reference. As long as the information is correct, it shouldn't matter from which resource it comes from.

W3Fools is nothing more than a rant against W3Schools. This site is just a collection of claims without any examples to prove them. For example they claim W3Schools to contain many outdated and/or wrong examples, but they provide no references to such 'bad' examples nor the correct solutions.

Because of that the comments linking to them are mostly unnecessary. Just flag comments that are not helpful. Banning that link does not make much sense, because people will find another thing to mess with.

When it comes to links to W3Schools, well, link-only answers are discouraged so the complete solution should be placed in answer and the link should be only back-reference. As long as the information is correct, it shouldn't matter from which resource it comes from.

2 grammar and some spelling, mostly made it more clear
source | link

W3Fools is nothing more than the rant against W3Schools. This site is just a little bunchcollection of claims without any examples to prooveprove them. For example they claim W3Schools to contain many outdated orand/or wrong examples, but they provide no sample linksrefrences to such 'bad' examples nor the correct solutions.

Because of that the comments linking to them are mostly noiseunnecessary. Just flag comments consisting of pure noise, banningthat are not helpful. Banning that link makesdoes not make much sense, because noiserpeople will find another viral toything to noisemess with ;).

When it comes to links to W3Schools, well, link-only answers are discouraged so the complete solution should be placed in answer and the link should be only back-reference. As long as the information is correct, it shouldn't matter from which resource does it comecomes from.

W3Fools is nothing more than the rant against W3Schools. This site is a little bunch of claims without any examples to proove them. For example they claim W3Schools to contain many outdated or wrong examples, but they provide no sample links to such 'bad' examples nor the correct solutions.

Because of that the comments linking to them are mostly noise. Just flag comments consisting of pure noise, banning that link makes not much sense, because noiser will find another viral toy to noise with ;)

When it comes to links to W3Schools, well, link-only answers are discouraged so the complete solution should be placed in answer and the link should be only back-reference. As long as the information is correct, it shouldn't matter from which resource does it come.

W3Fools is nothing more than the rant against W3Schools. This site is just a collection of claims without any examples to prove them. For example they claim W3Schools to contain many outdated and/or wrong examples, but they provide no refrences to such 'bad' examples nor the correct solutions.

Because of that the comments linking to them are mostly unnecessary. Just flag comments that are not helpful. Banning that link does not make much sense, because people will find another thing to mess with.

When it comes to links to W3Schools, well, link-only answers are discouraged so the complete solution should be placed in answer and the link should be only back-reference. As long as the information is correct, it shouldn't matter from which resource it comes from.

1
source | link

W3Fools is nothing more than the rant against W3Schools. This site is a little bunch of claims without any examples to proove them. For example they claim W3Schools to contain many outdated or wrong examples, but they provide no sample links to such 'bad' examples nor the correct solutions.

Because of that the comments linking to them are mostly noise. Just flag comments consisting of pure noise, banning that link makes not much sense, because noiser will find another viral toy to noise with ;)

When it comes to links to W3Schools, well, link-only answers are discouraged so the complete solution should be placed in answer and the link should be only back-reference. As long as the information is correct, it shouldn't matter from which resource does it come.