Timeline for What should we do with users that have been around for a while, and still don't ask questions correctly?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2011 at 15:13 | comment | added | user229044 | This is a situation where I'd leave a comment for the sole purpose of trying to prevent sympathy upvotes. More and more I find there's very little point to down-voting low-rep users, because for every no-comment-down-vote they seem to get two completely inappropriate up-votes. | |
| Sep 16, 2009 at 21:19 | comment | added | Shog9 | If you want to leave a comment, leave a comment. The site doesn't require you to do so, and neither do I expect you to; if you think you can write something helpful, that's great - but don't feel that you need to comment just for the sake of commenting. If the user has asked numerous low-quality questions previously, he should already have had sufficient exposure to constructive criticism to realize what's wrong - that he didn't bother taking it to heart doesn't bode well for the usefulness of any additional comments. | |
| Sep 16, 2009 at 21:13 | comment | added | MarkJ | Shouldn't you always leave a comment though? I think anonymous downvoting is a bit unfair - unless someone else has left a critical comment you agree with, in which case upvoting the comment is fine. | |
| Sep 16, 2009 at 19:51 | history | edited | Shog9 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
NOOOO! MY HYPHENS!
|
| Sep 16, 2009 at 19:45 | history | edited | GEOCHET | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited body; edited body
|
| Sep 16, 2009 at 18:59 | history | answered | Shog9 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |