Timeline for The time of automatic review bans should be increased with every new ban
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 16, 2015 at 5:27 | comment | added | Dave Alperovich | You miss the point about the bad audit question. More and more of them are being reported. Then again, maybe @dukeling is right... 3rd bad should result in execution. | |
| Apr 24, 2014 at 14:02 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Apr 24, 2014 at 14:01 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Feb 25, 2014 at 19:39 | comment | added | slhck | I have yet to see someone complaining about being banned for failing audits when doing the right action. It's absolutely okay to fail an audit from time to time, and this doesn't get you banned automatically. | |
| Feb 25, 2014 at 16:43 | comment | added | Shog9 | Never forget that there's a fair bit of sampling bias at work when evaluating the volume of meta complaints on a given subject. There are many hundreds of audits every day... | |
| Feb 25, 2014 at 16:41 | comment | added | Amicable | Also, you should probably submit this as a new question with the feature-request tag and link back to this question. | |
| Feb 25, 2014 at 16:41 | comment | added | Amicable | Agree 100%. Sometimes the questions/answers selected for reviews are just plain wrong, often due to policy change, so it's unavoidable to select the wrong review option sometimes. | |
| Feb 25, 2014 at 16:20 | history | answered | Cjxcz Odjcayrwl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |