Timeline for How to overcome "Edits must be at least 6 characters"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2019 at 19:17 | comment | added | endolith |
@Phlume Do you mean now? :)
|
|
| Feb 28, 2014 at 21:40 | comment | added | Phlume | @Bart Agreed. Thank you for the help clarifying for the users.. not perhaps a reversal could be in order from the DV peeps?? | |
| Feb 28, 2014 at 21:28 | comment | added | Bart | It's just that we have rather a lot of formatting abuse @Phlume, where users highlight every other word with code formatting. So I can see how users might misinterpret your suggestion. If it's not code, don't format it as such. If it is, then it's a valid suggestion. | |
| Feb 28, 2014 at 21:26 | history | edited | Phlume | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added explaination
|
| Feb 28, 2014 at 21:25 | comment | added | Phlume | Thank you @Bart for clarifying.. I will update the post as such. i do not mean to "hack" the system, just add another suggestion for ways to add to character count that is often overlooked in the fury of typing the question first time through. | |
| Feb 28, 2014 at 21:06 | comment | added | Bart | If the downvotes here are to indicate "please don't abuse code formatting", please note that that's not what the author seems to be suggesting. If I understand correctly, he's merely stating that authors tend to occasionally forget to properly format their in-line code. In which case formatting it would be appropriate. Of course it isn't a general highlighting tool. | |
| Feb 28, 2014 at 20:59 | history | answered | Phlume | CC BY-SA 3.0 |