Timeline for Is a question that specifically asks for a summary of a broad topic valuable to Stack Exchange?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2021 at 11:48 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://blog.stackoverflow.com with https://blog.stackoverflow.com
|
|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 3, 2014 at 17:28 | comment | added | Jimmy Hoffa | This question really shouldn't be asked here- but should be asked on individual meta sites... they have different purposes. That said I'll try and mention something you might be missing about P.SE: The site is held largely as trying to compete with Wikipedia, so content that would be identical to theirs is counter to the site's purpose. We are trying to gather authoritatively correct information like Wikipedia does, however in a format and fashion Wikipedia cannot- an encyclopedia of problems/solutions rather than topics. | |
| Jun 27, 2014 at 13:02 | comment | added | gnat | @jt0dd a problem with this is: "it is most likely that SE content would look inferior in comparison, making visitors think it generally sucks. This is exactly opposite of how we would want site be presented at search engines" (I'm trying really hard to find what is difficult to understand in this explanation) | |
| Jun 27, 2014 at 13:01 | comment | added | J.Todd |
I'm calling "I'm trying really hard to find a problem with this" on this answer. The one above also.
|
|
| Jun 27, 2014 at 12:25 | history | edited | gnat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
"crossover" += examples
|
| Jun 27, 2014 at 7:39 | history | edited | gnat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
wordsmithing
|
| Jun 27, 2014 at 6:50 | history | answered | gnat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |