3 replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
source | link

According to http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/163730/148099When should I delete an answer?, answers that are earnest attempts at an explanation, but that are technically incorrect, should be downvoted but not deleted.

However, the Low Quality review queue does not offer an easy way to do the right thing:

Screenshot: Review of low quality answer

  • "Looks OK" is inappropriate: "nothing is wrong" doesn't apply to a wrong answer.
  • "Edit" is inappropriate: Any edit that corrects the answer would also radically alter the meaning of the post.
  • "Recommend Deletion" is inappropriate since it is an earnest but misguided attempt at an answer.
  • "Skip" is, unfortunately, the only way to clear this item from the queue. However, skipping items isn't letting the reviewer be helpful.

Therefore, the Low Quality review queue needs to offer better choices of actions.

According to http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/163730/148099, answers that are earnest attempts at an explanation, but that are technically incorrect, should be downvoted but not deleted.

However, the Low Quality review queue does not offer an easy way to do the right thing:

Screenshot: Review of low quality answer

  • "Looks OK" is inappropriate: "nothing is wrong" doesn't apply to a wrong answer.
  • "Edit" is inappropriate: Any edit that corrects the answer would also radically alter the meaning of the post.
  • "Recommend Deletion" is inappropriate since it is an earnest but misguided attempt at an answer.
  • "Skip" is, unfortunately, the only way to clear this item from the queue. However, skipping items isn't letting the reviewer be helpful.

Therefore, the Low Quality review queue needs to offer better choices of actions.

According to When should I delete an answer?, answers that are earnest attempts at an explanation, but that are technically incorrect, should be downvoted but not deleted.

However, the Low Quality review queue does not offer an easy way to do the right thing:

Screenshot: Review of low quality answer

  • "Looks OK" is inappropriate: "nothing is wrong" doesn't apply to a wrong answer.
  • "Edit" is inappropriate: Any edit that corrects the answer would also radically alter the meaning of the post.
  • "Recommend Deletion" is inappropriate since it is an earnest but misguided attempt at an answer.
  • "Skip" is, unfortunately, the only way to clear this item from the queue. However, skipping items isn't letting the reviewer be helpful.

Therefore, the Low Quality review queue needs to offer better choices of actions.

    Post Closed as "duplicate" by gnat, Martijn Pieters, Azik, Shadow, ProgramFOX of
2 Removed specific feature request, leaving an open-ended bug report
source | link

Review of Low Quality answers should allow downvoting as a resolving actionoffers unsatisfactory choices of actions

According to http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/163730/148099, answers that are earnest attempts at an explanation, but that are technically incorrect, should be downvoted but not deleted.

However, the Low Quality review queue does not offer an easy way to do the right thing:

Screenshot: Review of low quality answer

  • "Looks OK" is inappropriate: "nothing is wrong" doesn't apply to a wrong answer.
  • "Edit" is inappropriate: Any edit that corrects the answer would also radically alter the meaning of the post.
  • "Recommend Deletion" is inappropriate since it is an earnest but misguided attempt at an answer.
  • "Skip" is, unfortunately, the only way to clear this item from the queue. However, skipping items isn't letting the reviewer be helpful.

Therefore, the Low Quality review queue needs to be reprogrammed to allow voting as a resolving actionoffer better choices of actions.

Review of Low Quality answers should allow downvoting as a resolving action

According to http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/163730/148099, answers that are earnest attempts at an explanation, but that are technically incorrect, should be downvoted but not deleted.

However, the Low Quality review queue does not offer an easy way to do the right thing:

Screenshot: Review of low quality answer

  • "Looks OK" is inappropriate: "nothing is wrong" doesn't apply to a wrong answer.
  • "Edit" is inappropriate: Any edit that corrects the answer would also radically alter the meaning of the post.
  • "Recommend Deletion" is inappropriate since it is an earnest but misguided attempt at an answer.
  • "Skip" is, unfortunately, the only way to clear this item from the queue.

Therefore, the Low Quality review queue needs to be reprogrammed to allow voting as a resolving action.

Review of Low Quality answers offers unsatisfactory choices of actions

According to http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/163730/148099, answers that are earnest attempts at an explanation, but that are technically incorrect, should be downvoted but not deleted.

However, the Low Quality review queue does not offer an easy way to do the right thing:

Screenshot: Review of low quality answer

  • "Looks OK" is inappropriate: "nothing is wrong" doesn't apply to a wrong answer.
  • "Edit" is inappropriate: Any edit that corrects the answer would also radically alter the meaning of the post.
  • "Recommend Deletion" is inappropriate since it is an earnest but misguided attempt at an answer.
  • "Skip" is, unfortunately, the only way to clear this item from the queue. However, skipping items isn't letting the reviewer be helpful.

Therefore, the Low Quality review queue needs to offer better choices of actions.

1
source | link

Review of Low Quality answers should allow downvoting as a resolving action

According to http://meta.stackexchange.com/q/163730/148099, answers that are earnest attempts at an explanation, but that are technically incorrect, should be downvoted but not deleted.

However, the Low Quality review queue does not offer an easy way to do the right thing:

Screenshot: Review of low quality answer

  • "Looks OK" is inappropriate: "nothing is wrong" doesn't apply to a wrong answer.
  • "Edit" is inappropriate: Any edit that corrects the answer would also radically alter the meaning of the post.
  • "Recommend Deletion" is inappropriate since it is an earnest but misguided attempt at an answer.
  • "Skip" is, unfortunately, the only way to clear this item from the queue.

Therefore, the Low Quality review queue needs to be reprogrammed to allow voting as a resolving action.