Timeline for Rep Gain/Lose on Per-Site Metas
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2018 at 15:17 | comment | added | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | "Meta Stack Exchange remains the exception to this, and folks participating there regularly more or less accept that they'll need to ward off a few flames from time to time." Well, some users, including me, disagree with this. I 100% agree that users shouldn't lose reputation and privileges just for expressing unpopular opinions, and I believe that the main gist of this answer should also be relevant to Meta Stack Exchange. The system also gives off a "clique" feeling by giving users the option to get their rep back in exchange for recanting their opinion. What can be done about this? | |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 16, 2015 at 19:55 | vote | accept | Chrismas007 | ||
| Jan 16, 2015 at 18:14 | comment | added | Monica Cellio | If you're looking at per-site metas, please please please consider not locking votes on meta. Opinions change. Situations change. And new posts get closed as duplicates of two-year-old ones from when that issue came up before and you've already voted. Meta needs to be able to be more flexible. | |
| Jan 16, 2015 at 18:01 | comment | added | Chrismas007 | Thanks @TimPost, that was the kind of answer previous questions on this topic needed. | |
| Jan 16, 2015 at 17:34 | history | answered | user50049 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |