2 added 62 characters in body
source | link

Reputation doesn't preclude someone from adhering to site policies. It doesn't give people the right to answer poorly. Unfortunately, what you're describing is common: the higher someone's reputation, frequently, the less willing they arepeople can be to downvote them. I wish this bias didn't exist, but it does.

Short answer: if you think it doesn't belong or isn't good, downvote and comment regardless of reputation. Really, just do everything regardless of reputation. It's better that way.

Reputation doesn't preclude someone from adhering to site policies. It doesn't give people the right to answer poorly. Unfortunately, what you're describing is common: the higher someone's reputation, frequently, the less willing they are to downvote them.

Short answer: if you think it doesn't belong, downvote and comment regardless of reputation. Really, just do everything regardless of reputation. It's better that way.

Reputation doesn't preclude someone from adhering to site policies. It doesn't give people the right to answer poorly. Unfortunately, what you're describing is common: the higher someone's reputation, frequently, the less willing people can be to downvote them. I wish this bias didn't exist, but it does.

Short answer: if you think it doesn't belong or isn't good, downvote and comment regardless of reputation. Really, just do everything regardless of reputation. It's better that way.

1
source | link

Reputation doesn't preclude someone from adhering to site policies. It doesn't give people the right to answer poorly. Unfortunately, what you're describing is common: the higher someone's reputation, frequently, the less willing they are to downvote them.

Short answer: if you think it doesn't belong, downvote and comment regardless of reputation. Really, just do everything regardless of reputation. It's better that way.