Skip to main content

Timeline for Stack Overflow Careers

Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5

5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 9, 2009 at 18:05 comment added seanmonstar Indeed. What I mean is that the $100 was related to a 1 year listing. Since I would never want a year, I immediately feel $100 is money spent on something I don't really want.
Oct 9, 2009 at 15:45 comment added Patrick McElhaney On what are you basing the cost-to-value ratio? The original price? If the original price was $800/year would you be asking for a 1-2 month subscription for $99? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/24897/stackoverflow-careers/…
Oct 7, 2009 at 20:23 comment added seanmonstar indeed. if i'm hired 2 months in, my listing is no longer useful for hiring people either.
Oct 7, 2009 at 20:17 comment added Kip Maybe $25 for 3 months would be better? Same price to post it for a whole year, but most people wouldn't need to pay for a whole year, and it would help keep signal-to-noise for the employer even lower.
Oct 7, 2009 at 19:54 history answered seanmonstar CC BY-SA 2.5