Timeline for Stack Overflow Careers
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 9, 2009 at 18:05 | comment | added | seanmonstar | Indeed. What I mean is that the $100 was related to a 1 year listing. Since I would never want a year, I immediately feel $100 is money spent on something I don't really want. | |
Oct 9, 2009 at 15:45 | comment | added | Patrick McElhaney | On what are you basing the cost-to-value ratio? The original price? If the original price was $800/year would you be asking for a 1-2 month subscription for $99? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/24897/stackoverflow-careers/… | |
Oct 7, 2009 at 20:23 | comment | added | seanmonstar | indeed. if i'm hired 2 months in, my listing is no longer useful for hiring people either. | |
Oct 7, 2009 at 20:17 | comment | added | Kip | Maybe $25 for 3 months would be better? Same price to post it for a whole year, but most people wouldn't need to pay for a whole year, and it would help keep signal-to-noise for the employer even lower. | |
Oct 7, 2009 at 19:54 | history | answered | seanmonstar | CC BY-SA 2.5 |