Skip to main content
Added buttons to mock-up
Source Link
200_success
  • 12.5k
  • 6
  • 35
  • 56

I propose to change the workflow so that a closure reason is required after suggesting migration. Namely,

  1. Click "close" or "flag".

  2. Click "off-topic".

    The dialog looks just like it does today, with one of the choices being

    ◉ This question belongs on another site in the Stack Exchange network

  3. Choose a migration target site.

    The dialog looks just like it does today. (I'd add emphasis that it needs to be a high-quality question.)

  4. Specify a closure reason.

    Flagging > Closing > Off-Topic > Migration > Closure Reason

    Why is this question off-topic for insert current site name here?

    ◎ Standard reason A
    ◎ Standard reason B
    ◎ Other (add a comment explaining what is wrong)


    Vote to migrate Cancel

    The migration flag is cancelled unless a closure reason is given.

One disadvantage of this proposal is that the thought process is a bit backwards: normally, one would classify a question as off-topic before suggesting migration.

I propose to change the workflow so that a closure reason is required after suggesting migration. Namely,

  1. Click "close" or "flag".

  2. Click "off-topic".

    The dialog looks just like it does today, with one of the choices being

    ◉ This question belongs on another site in the Stack Exchange network

  3. Choose a migration target site.

    The dialog looks just like it does today. (I'd add emphasis that it needs to be a high-quality question.)

  4. Specify a closure reason.

    Flagging > Closing > Off-Topic > Migration > Closure Reason

    Why is this question off-topic for insert current site name here?

    ◎ Standard reason A
    ◎ Standard reason B
    ◎ Other (add a comment explaining what is wrong)

    The migration flag is cancelled unless a closure reason is given.

One disadvantage of this proposal is that the thought process is a bit backwards: normally, one would classify a question as off-topic before suggesting migration.

I propose to change the workflow so that a closure reason is required after suggesting migration. Namely,

  1. Click "close" or "flag".

  2. Click "off-topic".

    The dialog looks just like it does today, with one of the choices being

    ◉ This question belongs on another site in the Stack Exchange network

  3. Choose a migration target site.

    The dialog looks just like it does today. (I'd add emphasis that it needs to be a high-quality question.)

  4. Specify a closure reason.

    Flagging > Closing > Off-Topic > Migration > Closure Reason

    Why is this question off-topic for insert current site name here?

    ◎ Standard reason A
    ◎ Standard reason B
    ◎ Other (add a comment explaining what is wrong)


    Vote to migrate Cancel

    The migration flag is cancelled unless a closure reason is given.

One disadvantage of this proposal is that the thought process is a bit backwards: normally, one would classify a question as off-topic before suggesting migration.

Emphasize the change
Source Link
200_success
  • 12.5k
  • 6
  • 35
  • 56

I propose to change the workflow so that a closure reason is required after suggesting migration. Namely,

  1. Click "close" or "flag".

  2. Click "off-topic".

    The dialog looks just like it does today, with one of the choices being

    ◉ This question belongs on another site in the Stack Exchange network

  3. Choose a migration target site.

    The dialog looks just like it does today. (I'd add emphasis that it needs to be a high-quality question.)

  4. Specify a closure reason.Specify a closure reason.

    Flagging > Closing > Off-Topic > Migration > Closure Reason

    Why is this question off-topic for insert current site name here?

    ◎ Standard reason A
    ◎ Standard reason B
    ◎ Other (add a comment explaining what is wrong)

    The migration flag is cancelled unless a closure reason is given.

The migration flag is cancelled unless a closure reason is given.

One disadvantage of this proposal is that the thought process is a bit backwards: normally, one would classify a question as off-topic before suggesting migration.

I propose to change the workflow so that a closure reason is required after suggesting migration. Namely,

  1. Click "close" or "flag".

  2. Click "off-topic".

    The dialog looks just like it does today, with one of the choices being

    ◉ This question belongs on another site in the Stack Exchange network

  3. Choose a migration target site.

    The dialog looks just like it does today. (I'd add emphasis that it needs to be a high-quality question.)

  4. Specify a closure reason.

    Flagging > Closing > Off-Topic > Migration > Closure Reason

    Why is this question off-topic for insert current site name here?

    ◎ Standard reason A
    ◎ Standard reason B
    ◎ Other (add a comment explaining what is wrong)

The migration flag is cancelled unless a closure reason is given.

One disadvantage of this proposal is that the thought process is a bit backwards: normally, one would classify a question as off-topic before suggesting migration.

I propose to change the workflow so that a closure reason is required after suggesting migration. Namely,

  1. Click "close" or "flag".

  2. Click "off-topic".

    The dialog looks just like it does today, with one of the choices being

    ◉ This question belongs on another site in the Stack Exchange network

  3. Choose a migration target site.

    The dialog looks just like it does today. (I'd add emphasis that it needs to be a high-quality question.)

  4. Specify a closure reason.

    Flagging > Closing > Off-Topic > Migration > Closure Reason

    Why is this question off-topic for insert current site name here?

    ◎ Standard reason A
    ◎ Standard reason B
    ◎ Other (add a comment explaining what is wrong)

    The migration flag is cancelled unless a closure reason is given.

One disadvantage of this proposal is that the thought process is a bit backwards: normally, one would classify a question as off-topic before suggesting migration.

Correction by @ChrisF
Source Link
200_success
  • 12.5k
  • 6
  • 35
  • 56

I propose to change the workflow so that a closure reason is required after suggesting migration. Namely,

  1. Click "close" or "flag".

  2. Click "off-topic".

    The dialog looks just like it does today, with one of the choices being

    ◉ This question belongs on another site in the Stack Exchange network

  3. Choose a migration target site.

    The dialog looks just like it does today. (I'd tweak it so that each site links to the /help/on-topic page, and emphasizeadd emphasis that it needs to be a high-quality question.)

  4. Specify a closure reason.

    Flagging > Closing > Off-Topic > Migration > Closure Reason

    Why is this question off-topic for insert current site name here?

    ◎ Standard reason A
    ◎ Standard reason B
    ◎ Other (add a comment explaining what is wrong)

The migration flag is cancelled unless a closure reason is given.

One disadvantage of this proposal is that the thought process is a bit backwards: normally, one would classify a question as off-topic before suggesting migration.

I propose to change the workflow so that a closure reason is required after suggesting migration. Namely,

  1. Click "close" or "flag".

  2. Click "off-topic".

    The dialog looks just like it does today, with one of the choices being

    ◉ This question belongs on another site in the Stack Exchange network

  3. Choose a migration target site.

    The dialog looks just like it does today. (I'd tweak it so that each site links to the /help/on-topic page, and emphasize that it needs to be a high-quality question.)

  4. Specify a closure reason.

    Flagging > Closing > Off-Topic > Migration > Closure Reason

    Why is this question off-topic for insert current site name here?

    ◎ Standard reason A
    ◎ Standard reason B
    ◎ Other (add a comment explaining what is wrong)

The migration flag is cancelled unless a closure reason is given.

One disadvantage of this proposal is that the thought process is a bit backwards: normally, one would classify a question as off-topic before suggesting migration.

I propose to change the workflow so that a closure reason is required after suggesting migration. Namely,

  1. Click "close" or "flag".

  2. Click "off-topic".

    The dialog looks just like it does today, with one of the choices being

    ◉ This question belongs on another site in the Stack Exchange network

  3. Choose a migration target site.

    The dialog looks just like it does today. (I'd add emphasis that it needs to be a high-quality question.)

  4. Specify a closure reason.

    Flagging > Closing > Off-Topic > Migration > Closure Reason

    Why is this question off-topic for insert current site name here?

    ◎ Standard reason A
    ◎ Standard reason B
    ◎ Other (add a comment explaining what is wrong)

The migration flag is cancelled unless a closure reason is given.

One disadvantage of this proposal is that the thought process is a bit backwards: normally, one would classify a question as off-topic before suggesting migration.

Source Link
200_success
  • 12.5k
  • 6
  • 35
  • 56
Loading