Timeline for Should we acknowledge 100k views questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://english.stackexchange.com/ with https://english.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 10, 2015 at 22:05 | answer | added | mattdm | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 21, 2015 at 10:43 | history | edited | Mari-Lou A Слава Україні | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
formatting
|
| Sep 19, 2015 at 14:49 | history | edited | Mari-Lou A Слава Україні | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added data
|
| Sep 19, 2015 at 14:44 | history | edited | Mari-Lou A Слава Україні | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 478 characters in body
|
| Sep 19, 2015 at 14:15 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M if you agree it's not dupe better delete the auto comment. | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 14:13 | comment | added | Mari-Lou A Слава Україні | @MadScientist there must be a plethora of "famous questions" on that site then! Don't you think a distinction should be made between a post that is visited 10,000 times and one that has reached 250,000 views? As seen in my question, EL&U also has its share of 250k views, but I suspect on SE Gardening (for instance) this number will be extremely difficult to attain. | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 13:36 | comment | added | wythagoras | This question on StackOverflow has been viewed 2.3m times. | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 13:16 | comment | added | Mad Scientist | On some sites 100k is not that unusual, I have 15 100k+ questions on Arqade. It is much easier to get many views there than on most other sites. | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 13:07 | answer | added | Shadow Wizard | timeline score: 13 | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 12:40 | history | edited | Wrzlprmft |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 19, 2015 at 12:13 | history | edited | Mari-Lou A Слава Україні | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
shorter and more acurate title
|
| Sep 19, 2015 at 11:52 | comment | added | M.A.R. | Removed feature-request tag to make this distinct from those other questions. I now agree this is a worthwhile discussion to have. I can't retract my flag though. :| | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 11:51 | history | edited | M.A.R. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Sep 19, 2015 at 11:48 | comment | added | Mari-Lou A Слава Україні | @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M those are horrendous questions! I am not suggesting SE replace the milestones, or change the names of badges. I am asking whether 100k views should be acknowledged in some way. I clearly stated: I don't know which form should this recognition take, I am asking the community what they think. Give this request time and an opportunity to be viewed, if nobody posts an answer by Tuesday, I will voluntarily close the question. | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 11:41 | comment | added | M.A.R. | Mari-Lou this has been discussed numerous times in different variations. If you like, I can change and choose another one, like this or this. Even though they're worse phrased than yours, the rationale remains the same: There are no 'milestone indicators' above the gold badge thresholds and there aren't going to be any. | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 11:36 | comment | added | Mari-Lou A Слава Україні | @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M could you please explain why my question is an exact duplicate? I can see they are related but they are not identical to one another. Is just the mere mention of platinum badge suffice to close this question? | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 11:21 | history | edited | Mari-Lou A Слава Україні | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1225 characters in body
|
| Sep 19, 2015 at 11:15 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 19, 2015 at 14:13 | |||||
| Sep 19, 2015 at 11:00 | comment | added | Mari-Lou A Слава Україні | definitely related, I admit but this is not a duplicate of that question. | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 10:55 | history | asked | Mari-Lou A Слава Україні | CC BY-SA 3.0 |