Timeline for Discouraging repwhoring - Reverse rep from answers posted shortly before the question gets closed
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2015 at 16:38 | comment | added | Siguza | @NathanTuggy That's how the voting system calls it. But yes, I mean "undone". | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 11:44 | history | edited | Siguza | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Avoid possible misinterpretation in title
|
| Nov 18, 2015 at 2:57 | comment | added | Ilmari Karonen | Ps. +1, but even with the TL;DR summary at the top, this proposal is pretty hard to read. Some trimming and copyediting might be useful. | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 0:44 | comment | added | Nathan Tuggy | I think "reversed" is a slightly poor choice of wording; you mean "reset back as though it had not occurred", and for that reversed is not exactly wrong, but when referring to numeric changes, reversal sounds more like flipping the sign: subtracting positive values instead of adding them and adding negative instead of subtracting. That, of course, is not what's intended at all. | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 0:37 | comment | added | Ilmari Karonen | Am I the only one who first parsed "combat repwhoring" as a noun phrase? The mental image is... interesting. | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 22:57 | comment | added | Siguza | @Mat'sMug True, edited that in. | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 22:57 | history | edited | Siguza | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 49 characters in body; edited title; added 66 characters in body
|
| Nov 17, 2015 at 22:56 | comment | added | Mathieu Guindon | Looks like it's more about battling rep-whoring over off-topic questions than FGITW though. | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 22:52 | history | edited | Siguza | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 42 characters in body
|
| Nov 17, 2015 at 22:45 | history | asked | Siguza | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
