5 bumped room count again after looking at more active numbers
source | link

I think one aspect that has been overlooked is the divided nature of the existing chat systems. Currently, there are three separate chat environments - one each for MSE, SO, and the rest of SE.

I think that divided nature has helped foster some otherwise niche behaviour that wouldn't have been able to take root had their been greater visibility. I bring this up because new guidance is helpful, but guidance requires governance in order to become habit.

One particular challenge that the divided nature of chat creates is the number of trusted users or moderators who can keep an eye on activities and help discourage unwanted behaviour.

Put into numbers1, we have:

  • n diamond moderators (SE employees) on chat.meta across 15+ rooms
  • 18 diamond moderators (SO mods) on chat.so across 30'ish30-40'ish rooms
  • 400+ diamond moderators on chat.se across 80'ish80-90'ish rooms

And while I'm not claiming that chat.se doesn't have some of the problems that rooms on the other chat sites have experienced, those problems tend to be more quickly resolved simply based upon the sheer number of moderators available to help fix things.

So one thing I would suggest considering is unifying all of the chat systems. It's akin to how we handle navigation across SE sites - whether I'm going to SO or Programmers or Engineering, it doesn't matter as it's all part of the Stack Exchange system.

Unifying chat would help resolve some of the issues that the divided chat systems inadvertently foster.

And, if unification is not a feasible option for whatever reason, perhaps allow users to affiliate their chat profile with the main site profile of their choice. I don't think this would be as effective, as it will require 10k+ and moderators to be signed into both systems, but it would at least allow our core experienced users to help provide governance.

1 Numbers were based upon a quick check of number of rooms at each chat site as well taking a swag at the number of moderators across SE

2 Please also note that chat room numbers fluctuate a bit. When I first pulled counts for this the numbers were different than where they are now. Also note that miscounted the number of SE sites and my initial guess on SE mods was low.

I think one aspect that has been overlooked is the divided nature of the existing chat systems. Currently, there are three separate chat environments - one each for MSE, SO, and the rest of SE.

I think that divided nature has helped foster some otherwise niche behaviour that wouldn't have been able to take root had their been greater visibility. I bring this up because new guidance is helpful, but guidance requires governance in order to become habit.

One particular challenge that the divided nature of chat creates is the number of trusted users or moderators who can keep an eye on activities and help discourage unwanted behaviour.

Put into numbers1, we have:

  • n diamond moderators (SE employees) on chat.meta across 15+ rooms
  • 18 diamond moderators (SO mods) on chat.so across 30'ish rooms
  • 400+ diamond moderators on chat.se across 80'ish rooms

And while I'm not claiming that chat.se doesn't have some of the problems that rooms on the other chat sites have experienced, those problems tend to be more quickly resolved simply based upon the sheer number of moderators available to help fix things.

So one thing I would suggest considering is unifying all of the chat systems. It's akin to how we handle navigation across SE sites - whether I'm going to SO or Programmers or Engineering, it doesn't matter as it's all part of the Stack Exchange system.

Unifying chat would help resolve some of the issues that the divided chat systems inadvertently foster.

And, if unification is not a feasible option for whatever reason, perhaps allow users to affiliate their chat profile with the main site profile of their choice. I don't think this would be as effective, as it will require 10k+ and moderators to be signed into both systems, but it would at least allow our core experienced users to help provide governance.

1 Numbers were based upon a quick check of number of rooms at each chat site as well taking a swag at the number of moderators across SE

2 Please also note that chat room numbers fluctuate a bit. When I first pulled counts for this the numbers were different than where they are now. Also note that miscounted the number of SE sites and my initial guess on SE mods was low.

I think one aspect that has been overlooked is the divided nature of the existing chat systems. Currently, there are three separate chat environments - one each for MSE, SO, and the rest of SE.

I think that divided nature has helped foster some otherwise niche behaviour that wouldn't have been able to take root had their been greater visibility. I bring this up because new guidance is helpful, but guidance requires governance in order to become habit.

One particular challenge that the divided nature of chat creates is the number of trusted users or moderators who can keep an eye on activities and help discourage unwanted behaviour.

Put into numbers1, we have:

  • n diamond moderators (SE employees) on chat.meta across 15+ rooms
  • 18 diamond moderators (SO mods) on chat.so across 30-40'ish rooms
  • 400+ diamond moderators on chat.se across 80-90'ish rooms

And while I'm not claiming that chat.se doesn't have some of the problems that rooms on the other chat sites have experienced, those problems tend to be more quickly resolved simply based upon the sheer number of moderators available to help fix things.

So one thing I would suggest considering is unifying all of the chat systems. It's akin to how we handle navigation across SE sites - whether I'm going to SO or Programmers or Engineering, it doesn't matter as it's all part of the Stack Exchange system.

Unifying chat would help resolve some of the issues that the divided chat systems inadvertently foster.

And, if unification is not a feasible option for whatever reason, perhaps allow users to affiliate their chat profile with the main site profile of their choice. I don't think this would be as effective, as it will require 10k+ and moderators to be signed into both systems, but it would at least allow our core experienced users to help provide governance.

1 Numbers were based upon a quick check of number of rooms at each chat site as well taking a swag at the number of moderators across SE

2 Please also note that chat room numbers fluctuate a bit. When I first pulled counts for this the numbers were different than where they are now. Also note that miscounted the number of SE sites and my initial guess on SE mods was low.

4 improved grammar a bit
source | link

I think one aspect that has been overlooked is the divided nature of the existing chat systems. Currently, there are three separate chat environments - one each for MSE, SO, and the rest of SE.

I think that divided nature has helped foster some otherwise niche behaviour that wouldn't have been able to take root had their been greater visibility. I bring this up because new guidance is helpful, but guidance requires governance in order to become habit.

One particular challenge that the divided nature of chat creates is the number of trusted users or moderators who can keep an eye on activities and help discourage unwanted behaviour.

Put into numbers1, we have:

  • n diamond moderators (SE employees) on chat.meta across 15+ rooms
  • 18 diamond moderators (SO mods) on chat.so across 30'ish rooms
  • 400+ diamond moderators on chat.se across 80'ish rooms

And while I'm not claiming that chat.se doesn't have some of the problems that rooms on the other chat sites have experienced, those problems tend to be more quickly resolved simply based upon the sheer number of moderators available to help fix things.

So one thing I would suggest considering is unifying all of the chat systems. It's akin to how we handle navigation across SE sites - whether I'm going to SO or Programmers or Engineering, it doesn't matter as it's all part of the Stack Exchange system.

Unifying chat helpswould help resolve some of the issues that the divided chat systems inadvertently foster.

And, if unification is not a feasible option for whatever reason, perhaps allow users to affiliate their chat profile with the main site profile of their choice. I don't think this would be as effective, as it will require 10k+ and moderators to be signed into both systems, but it would at least allow our orecore experienced users to help provide governance.

1 Numbers were based upon a quick check of number of rooms at each chat site as well taking a swag at the number of moderators across SE

2 Please also note that chat room numbers fluctuate a bit. When I first pulled counts for this the numbers were different than where they are now. Also note that miscounted the number of SE sites and my initial guess on SE mods was low.

I think one aspect that has been overlooked is the divided nature of the existing chat systems. Currently, there are three separate chat environments - one each for MSE, SO, and the rest of SE.

I think that divided nature has helped foster some otherwise niche behaviour that wouldn't have been able to take root had their been greater visibility. I bring this up because new guidance is helpful, but guidance requires governance in order to become habit.

One particular challenge that the divided nature of chat creates is the number of trusted users or moderators who can keep an eye on activities and help discourage unwanted behaviour.

Put into numbers1, we have:

  • n diamond moderators (SE employees) on chat.meta across 15+ rooms
  • 18 diamond moderators (SO mods) on chat.so across 30'ish rooms
  • 400+ diamond moderators on chat.se across 80'ish rooms

And while I'm not claiming that chat.se doesn't have some of the problems that rooms on the other chat sites have experienced, those problems tend to be more quickly resolved simply based upon the sheer number of moderators available to help fix things.

So one thing I would suggest considering is unifying all of the chat systems. It's akin to how we handle navigation across SE sites - whether I'm going to SO or Programmers or Engineering, it doesn't matter as it's all part of the Stack Exchange system.

Unifying chat helps resolve some of the issues that divided chat systems inadvertently foster.

And if unification is not a feasible option for whatever reason, allow users to affiliate their chat profile with the main site profile of their choice. I don't think this would be as effective as it will require 10k+ and moderators to be signed into both systems, but it would at least allow our ore experienced users help provide governance.

1 Numbers were based upon a quick check of number of rooms at each chat site as well taking a swag at the number of moderators across SE

2 Please also note that chat room numbers fluctuate a bit. When I first pulled counts for this the numbers were different than where they are now. Also note that miscounted the number of SE sites and my initial guess on SE mods was low.

I think one aspect that has been overlooked is the divided nature of the existing chat systems. Currently, there are three separate chat environments - one each for MSE, SO, and the rest of SE.

I think that divided nature has helped foster some otherwise niche behaviour that wouldn't have been able to take root had their been greater visibility. I bring this up because new guidance is helpful, but guidance requires governance in order to become habit.

One particular challenge that the divided nature of chat creates is the number of trusted users or moderators who can keep an eye on activities and help discourage unwanted behaviour.

Put into numbers1, we have:

  • n diamond moderators (SE employees) on chat.meta across 15+ rooms
  • 18 diamond moderators (SO mods) on chat.so across 30'ish rooms
  • 400+ diamond moderators on chat.se across 80'ish rooms

And while I'm not claiming that chat.se doesn't have some of the problems that rooms on the other chat sites have experienced, those problems tend to be more quickly resolved simply based upon the sheer number of moderators available to help fix things.

So one thing I would suggest considering is unifying all of the chat systems. It's akin to how we handle navigation across SE sites - whether I'm going to SO or Programmers or Engineering, it doesn't matter as it's all part of the Stack Exchange system.

Unifying chat would help resolve some of the issues that the divided chat systems inadvertently foster.

And, if unification is not a feasible option for whatever reason, perhaps allow users to affiliate their chat profile with the main site profile of their choice. I don't think this would be as effective, as it will require 10k+ and moderators to be signed into both systems, but it would at least allow our core experienced users to help provide governance.

1 Numbers were based upon a quick check of number of rooms at each chat site as well taking a swag at the number of moderators across SE

2 Please also note that chat room numbers fluctuate a bit. When I first pulled counts for this the numbers were different than where they are now. Also note that miscounted the number of SE sites and my initial guess on SE mods was low.

3 added 1 character in body
source | link

I think one aspect that has been overlooked is the divided nature of the existing chat systems. Currently, there are three separate chat environments - one each for MSE, SO, and the rest of SE.

I think that divided nature has helped foster some otherwise niche behaviour that wouldn't have been able to take root had their been greater visibility. I bring this up because new guidance is helpful, but guidance requires governance in order to become habit.

One particular challenge that the divided nature of chat creates is the number of trusted users or moderators who can keep an eye on activities and help discourage unwanted behaviour.

Put into numbers1, we have:

  • n diamond moderators (SE employees) on chat.meta across 15+ rooms
  • 18 diamond moderators (SO mods) on chat.so across 30'ish rooms
  • 400+ diamond moderators on chat.se across 80'ish rooms

And while I'm not claiming that chat.se doesn't have some of the problems that rooms on the other chat sites have experienced, those problems tend to be more quickly resolved simply based upon the sheer number of moderators available to help fix things.

So one thing I would suggest considering is unifying all of the chat systems. It's akin to how we handle navigation across SE sites - whether I'm going to SO or Programmers or Engineering, it doesn't matter as it's all part of the StackExchangeStack Exchange system.

Unifying chat helps resolve some of the issues that divided chat systems inadvertently foster.

And if unification is not a feasible option for whatever reason, allow users to affiliate their chat profile with the main site profile of their choice. I don't think this would be as effective as it will require 10k+ and moderators to be signed into both systems, but it would at least allow our ore experienced users help provide governance.

1 Numbers were based upon a quick check of number of rooms at each chat site as well taking a swag at the number of moderators across SE

2 Please also note that chat room numbers fluctuate a bit. When I first pulled counts for this the numbers were different than where they are now. Also note that miscounted the number of SE sites and my initial guess on SE mods was low.

I think one aspect that has been overlooked is the divided nature of the existing chat systems. Currently, there are three separate chat environments - one each for MSE, SO, and the rest of SE.

I think that divided nature has helped foster some otherwise niche behaviour that wouldn't have been able to take root had their been greater visibility. I bring this up because new guidance is helpful, but guidance requires governance in order to become habit.

One particular challenge that the divided nature of chat creates is the number of trusted users or moderators who can keep an eye on activities and help discourage unwanted behaviour.

Put into numbers1, we have:

  • n diamond moderators (SE employees) on chat.meta across 15+ rooms
  • 18 diamond moderators (SO mods) on chat.so across 30'ish rooms
  • 400+ diamond moderators on chat.se across 80'ish rooms

And while I'm not claiming that chat.se doesn't have some of the problems that rooms on the other chat sites have experienced, those problems tend to be more quickly resolved simply based upon the sheer number of moderators available to help fix things.

So one thing I would suggest considering is unifying all of the chat systems. It's akin to how we handle navigation across SE sites - whether I'm going to SO or Programmers or Engineering, it doesn't matter as it's all part of the StackExchange system.

Unifying chat helps resolve some of the issues that divided chat systems inadvertently foster.

And if unification is not a feasible option for whatever reason, allow users to affiliate their chat profile with the main site profile of their choice. I don't think this would be as effective as it will require 10k+ and moderators to be signed into both systems, but it would at least allow our ore experienced users help provide governance.

1 Numbers were based upon a quick check of number of rooms at each chat site as well taking a swag at the number of moderators across SE

2 Please also note that chat room numbers fluctuate a bit. When I first pulled counts for this the numbers were different than where they are now. Also note that miscounted the number of SE sites and my initial guess on SE mods was low.

I think one aspect that has been overlooked is the divided nature of the existing chat systems. Currently, there are three separate chat environments - one each for MSE, SO, and the rest of SE.

I think that divided nature has helped foster some otherwise niche behaviour that wouldn't have been able to take root had their been greater visibility. I bring this up because new guidance is helpful, but guidance requires governance in order to become habit.

One particular challenge that the divided nature of chat creates is the number of trusted users or moderators who can keep an eye on activities and help discourage unwanted behaviour.

Put into numbers1, we have:

  • n diamond moderators (SE employees) on chat.meta across 15+ rooms
  • 18 diamond moderators (SO mods) on chat.so across 30'ish rooms
  • 400+ diamond moderators on chat.se across 80'ish rooms

And while I'm not claiming that chat.se doesn't have some of the problems that rooms on the other chat sites have experienced, those problems tend to be more quickly resolved simply based upon the sheer number of moderators available to help fix things.

So one thing I would suggest considering is unifying all of the chat systems. It's akin to how we handle navigation across SE sites - whether I'm going to SO or Programmers or Engineering, it doesn't matter as it's all part of the Stack Exchange system.

Unifying chat helps resolve some of the issues that divided chat systems inadvertently foster.

And if unification is not a feasible option for whatever reason, allow users to affiliate their chat profile with the main site profile of their choice. I don't think this would be as effective as it will require 10k+ and moderators to be signed into both systems, but it would at least allow our ore experienced users help provide governance.

1 Numbers were based upon a quick check of number of rooms at each chat site as well taking a swag at the number of moderators across SE

2 Please also note that chat room numbers fluctuate a bit. When I first pulled counts for this the numbers were different than where they are now. Also note that miscounted the number of SE sites and my initial guess on SE mods was low.

2 added 345 characters in body
source | link
1
source | link