Timeline for es.SO questions aren't excluded from the Hot Questions list
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
34 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 4, 2017 at 5:54 | history | edited | avpaderno |
edited tags
|
|
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Jan 18, 2016 at 5:37 | vote | accept | Zaibis | ||
S Jan 18, 2016 at 5:37 | history | bounty ended | Zaibis | ||
S Jan 18, 2016 at 5:37 | history | notice removed | Zaibis | ||
Jan 11, 2016 at 21:16 | comment | added | gnat | @ShadowWizard feel the irony | |
Jan 11, 2016 at 20:30 | answer | added | Adam LearStaffMod | timeline score: 11 | |
Jan 11, 2016 at 20:30 | history | edited | Adam LearStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
Jan 11, 2016 at 20:16 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @gnat huh, now that's a valid point. Good luck upvoting all the possible HNQ! ;) | |
Jan 11, 2016 at 19:58 | comment | added | gnat | @ShadowWizard understood, thanks. Now, if the full list gets 7-8 questions from one site, think of the chances for sidebar to be occupied by 2-3 of them | |
Jan 11, 2016 at 19:56 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @gnat talking only about the sidebar of each site, not the global list. Only few people visit the full list, most just see the sidebar. (as far as I can tell) | |
Jan 11, 2016 at 19:55 | comment | added | gnat | @ShadowWizard per my recollection, there's no such limit. I recall seeing up to 5-6 questions from SO, Workplace, Math. Hey, I just found a documented case of seven TWP questions in the list | |
Jan 11, 2016 at 19:51 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @gnat oh, I thought you mean upvoting the questions already in the list. Well, I think the limit is 3 per site, so still - no extra attention. :) | |
Jan 11, 2016 at 19:49 | comment | added | gnat | @ShadowWizard currently there are two es.SO questions in the list, that looks tolerable. Think of what would happen when there will be 7-8 of them over there | |
Jan 11, 2016 at 19:40 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @gnat not sure how that would draw attention? That is what already happening for most HNQ questions. | |
Jan 11, 2016 at 19:21 | history | edited | gnat |
edited tags
|
|
Jan 11, 2016 at 19:19 | comment | added | gnat | @ShadowWizard probably most reliable way to really draw attention would be to create login at es.SO and lemming-upvote everything in their questions that pop up in the HNQ | |
Jan 11, 2016 at 10:33 | comment | added | Zaibis | @JonW: Ok, so we have the same point. But actually this isn't that relevant because then the question is one of: 1) Why only es.SO is in HNQ? or: Why is es.SO in HNQ? What ever of this it is, there is something wrong. ;) | |
Jan 11, 2016 at 10:29 | comment | added | JonW | I agree it should be all or nothing, but if a site is receiving enough attention to trigger the HNQ criteria then I would say that whether the majority of people understand the language is no more/less relevant than if the majority of people understand the subject-matter. I just don't want us working from an assumption that they shouldn't be displayed when in fact that assumption is wrong in the first place. | |
Jan 11, 2016 at 10:23 | comment | added | Zaibis | @JonW: yeah thats right. But then anyway: Why is it one and only that es.SO and nothing else? And now imagine for equality reasons the other foreign language pages get there aswell: I wouldn't even paying attention that much anymore if there were 20-30% of the HNQ's of sites where I can't even understand the language. And thats probably not what the HNQ are designed for, is it? | |
Jan 11, 2016 at 10:19 | comment | added | JonW | I'm not entirely convinced that they should be excluded. That linked post doesn't state that this should be the case. Surely one of the purposes of the HQ list is to make people aware of sites they may not otherwise know about. I don't see why foreign-language ones are an exception. I find it equally as relevant to my interests as mathematics.se or code golf (i.e. no interest). But some people may find it useful to know these sites exist. | |
Jan 11, 2016 at 10:09 | history | edited | nicael | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
S Jan 11, 2016 at 9:17 | history | bounty started | Zaibis | ||
S Jan 11, 2016 at 9:17 | history | notice added | Zaibis | Draw attention | |
Dec 21, 2015 at 12:59 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | Comments draw no attention, I'm afraid. You can edit the question, or start a bounty, those are the common ways to bump - but I've seen bugs that exist for years without getting any fix or even hint of attention, so don't expect for too much. | |
Dec 21, 2015 at 12:57 | comment | added | Zaibis | I didn't address this to anyone. I was hoping a comment may be something that helps getting generell attention but seems I was wrong | |
Dec 21, 2015 at 12:56 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | Don't ask me (I'm the only one who got notified of your comment), I'm just ordinary user like you. | |
Dec 21, 2015 at 12:49 | comment | added | Zaibis | Any updates on why they still are part of HNQ sidebar? | |
Dec 17, 2015 at 14:16 | history | edited | Shadow Wizard |
edited tags
|
|
Dec 17, 2015 at 14:16 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | Sounds like someone forgot to update a list somewhere, as es.SO is new. (there's probably no "show in HNQ sidebar" column, just a static list of sites to exclude) | |
Dec 17, 2015 at 13:03 | history | edited | nicael | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 47 characters in body
|
Dec 17, 2015 at 13:03 | history | edited | Zaibis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
Dec 17, 2015 at 13:03 | history | edited | nicael | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
Dec 17, 2015 at 13:01 | history | asked | Zaibis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |