Timeline for Is using reputation to scale the number of close votes the best way?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 18, 2016 at 16:54 | comment | added | Nathaniel is protesting | @Wildcard Right, (1) doesn't give us much information so I wouldn't count it either way. As for (3), I wouldn't say it's common, but I've certainly observed it in communities where the vast majority of close votes are cast by one of 7–10 users, and not all of them vote daily or even weekly. So yes, "most close-worthy questions" won't have expiring close votes, but I think it's non-trivial enough to account for it. | |
| Nov 18, 2016 at 6:43 | comment | added | Wildcard | I think most questions that are really close-worthy won't have the close vote expire. Isn't that the point of the vote expiration? But I could see not counting scenario (1) in either direction. I guess that's what you're driving at. | |
| Jul 29, 2016 at 19:11 | history | answered | Nathaniel is protesting | CC BY-SA 3.0 |