Timeline for Is using reputation to scale the number of close votes the best way?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 9:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Oct 13, 2016 at 23:33 | comment | added | πάντα ῥεῖ | @rene I'd also support scaling votes actually. | |
| Oct 13, 2016 at 23:32 | comment | added | πάντα ῥεῖ | @Magisch There was a MSO featured experiment (last year?) that had proven that more votes didn't have a significant effect. | |
| Jul 29, 2016 at 21:30 | history | edited | Magisch | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 785 characters in body
|
| Jul 29, 2016 at 21:19 | comment | added | Magisch | @rene Its a X-Y problem. The idea behind the question is if giving high rep users more votes will have a positive effect / make the situation better. The answer to that is no. Maybe I just read it wrong, but before we discuss whom to give more votes, I think its worth looking at wether more votes are actually part of the solution. | |
| Jul 29, 2016 at 21:17 | comment | added | rene Mod | Your answer is a bit disappointing because it doesn't address the question. I read the question as: let's get more votes on, you only come-up with don't do that. I assume you do agree with a quality improvement of the posts on SE, starting with SO, If scaling votes isn't the way forward, what are other options? | |
| Jul 29, 2016 at 21:05 | history | answered | Magisch | CC BY-SA 3.0 |