Timeline for Why we don't keep public records of suspensions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2017 at 19:12 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Apr 14, 2017 at 19:29 | |||||
| Apr 5, 2017 at 22:34 | comment | added | Shog9 | To give you a rough idea, @E.P.... I listed 9444 ended suspensions for the entire history of Stack Overflow. The total number of suspensions for the rest of the network (combined) is 5908, which includes ongoing suspensions and in some cases users who are now deleted. Outside of Stack Overflow, the single site with the largest number of suspended users over time is this site - Meta Stack Exchange - with 1177, followed by Super User with 631 and Math with 568. The numbers get pretty small pretty fast after that. | |
| Apr 5, 2017 at 19:36 | comment | added | E.P. |
Focusing on Stack Overflow might help make the numbers high enough to kill some unwanted statistical gremlins, but SO is a very different site to the rest of the network, so it would also be interesting to have those same numbers for SE\setminusSO. Or are the suspension numbers on the non-SO network really that low? If so, how low?
|
|
| Apr 5, 2017 at 18:59 | comment | added | Shog9 | Ah. That's harder to get. ;-P | |
| Apr 5, 2017 at 18:58 | comment | added | anon | hahaha I mean rep the moment before suspension | |
| Apr 5, 2017 at 18:57 | comment | added | Shog9 | I ran a quick check - turns out, all suspended users have 1 rep. | |
| Apr 5, 2017 at 18:56 | comment | added | anon | It would be interesting to have a look at suspensions and user rep | |
| Apr 5, 2017 at 18:50 | history | answered | Shog9 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |