Timeline for Additional Badge Ideas
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 14, 2010 at 13:35 | comment | added | Randolpho | @Rob Heiser: I like "Unsung Hero" as well. | |
Mar 26, 2010 at 21:07 | comment | added | Rob Heiser | "Unrewarded" is good. I was thinking of it as "Unsung Hero". Getting an answer accepted with no upvotes feels like it was just grudgingly accepted by the inquirer. | |
Jan 12, 2010 at 20:34 | comment | added | David Hall | The duration requirement was intended to refer to a grand total percent, not to the spot average. So I was thinking 90% of all time activity is questions, over n days) however, thinking about this, it wouldn't be necessary since once rewarded, badges are not removed. | |
Jan 12, 2010 at 10:17 | comment | added | Jürgen A. Erhard | Why not add a minimum count to Inq and Help? Otherwise, one answer in 10 days would get you the badge. | |
Dec 12, 2009 at 4:05 | comment | added | David Hall | Good point about those badges going to almost everyone, perhaps more restrictive criteria? 95%? I think there is something to be said for badges that server as statistical measures - how many people are there who pretty much only answer questions? Though, maybe it doesn't server the other purpose of driving desirable behaviour. | |
Dec 11, 2009 at 5:18 | comment | added | Ether | I like "Unrewarded" as a consolation prize for not getting (presumably) good questions upvoted, if it were restricted to answers with only zero votes. However, almost everyone will end up getting at least one of the other three badges, which would render them fairly pointless. | |
Dec 10, 2009 at 22:24 | history | edited | Andrew Grimm | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Fix typo
|
Dec 10, 2009 at 22:06 | history | answered | David Hall | CC BY-SA 2.5 |