2 added 330 characters in body
source | link

Even if the question is good, they were too lazy to follow up, and they deserve the downvote.

No. While you're free to downvote as you like, it's very much appreciated if you follow the golden rule: "Vote for the content, not for the author." It's a good question (you said it yourself), so vote it up.

Whether an answer is accepted or not doesn't really matter anyway. That's just one person's decision/opinion; whether an answer is good or not is better judged by the entire community, whose decision is reflected in the answer score, not in that checkmark or lack thereof.

Is there a better solution?

Sometimes leaving a comment helps. New users often aren't familiar with the etiquette here and simply don't know they can accept an answer (or edit their question to provide more details). Try to focus on the benefits for that user ("without more information we won't be able to help you") rather than trying to shove Stack Exchange rules down their throat; "without more information we'll close your question" is not really welcoming.

But not accepting it creates a drain on the whole site, because it looks "unanswered" and shows up when you filter that way.

If you suspect an answer would work (even though you can't test it) you can upvote the answer to remove the 'unanswered' status on the question. See Why does the "Unanswered Questions" tab show questions that have answers?

Even if the question is good, they were too lazy to follow up, and they deserve the downvote.

No. While you're free to downvote as you like, it's very much appreciated if you follow the golden rule: "Vote for the content, not for the author." It's a good question (you said it yourself), so vote it up.

Whether an answer is accepted or not doesn't really matter anyway. That's just one person's decision/opinion; whether an answer is good or not is better judged by the entire community, whose decision is reflected in the answer score, not in that checkmark or lack thereof.

Is there a better solution?

Sometimes leaving a comment helps. New users often aren't familiar with the etiquette here and simply don't know they can accept an answer (or edit their question to provide more details). Try to focus on the benefits for that user ("without more information we won't be able to help you") rather than trying to shove Stack Exchange rules down their throat; "without more information we'll close your question" is not really welcoming.

Even if the question is good, they were too lazy to follow up, and they deserve the downvote.

No. While you're free to downvote as you like, it's very much appreciated if you follow the golden rule: "Vote for the content, not for the author." It's a good question (you said it yourself), so vote it up.

Whether an answer is accepted or not doesn't really matter anyway. That's just one person's decision/opinion; whether an answer is good or not is better judged by the entire community, whose decision is reflected in the answer score, not in that checkmark or lack thereof.

Is there a better solution?

Sometimes leaving a comment helps. New users often aren't familiar with the etiquette here and simply don't know they can accept an answer (or edit their question to provide more details). Try to focus on the benefits for that user ("without more information we won't be able to help you") rather than trying to shove Stack Exchange rules down their throat; "without more information we'll close your question" is not really welcoming.

But not accepting it creates a drain on the whole site, because it looks "unanswered" and shows up when you filter that way.

If you suspect an answer would work (even though you can't test it) you can upvote the answer to remove the 'unanswered' status on the question. See Why does the "Unanswered Questions" tab show questions that have answers?

1
source | link

Even if the question is good, they were too lazy to follow up, and they deserve the downvote.

No. While you're free to downvote as you like, it's very much appreciated if you follow the golden rule: "Vote for the content, not for the author." It's a good question (you said it yourself), so vote it up.

Whether an answer is accepted or not doesn't really matter anyway. That's just one person's decision/opinion; whether an answer is good or not is better judged by the entire community, whose decision is reflected in the answer score, not in that checkmark or lack thereof.

Is there a better solution?

Sometimes leaving a comment helps. New users often aren't familiar with the etiquette here and simply don't know they can accept an answer (or edit their question to provide more details). Try to focus on the benefits for that user ("without more information we won't be able to help you") rather than trying to shove Stack Exchange rules down their throat; "without more information we'll close your question" is not really welcoming.