Timeline for Congratulations to our 29 oldest beta sites - They're now no longer beta!
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2019 at 10:08 | comment | added | awe | I think loosing the beta label requires a manual audit of the health, rather than specific rules of what has to be in place. It should be some guidelines to what makes a healthy site, but not some absolute demands to stats. | |
| Aug 11, 2019 at 10:23 | comment | added | trichoplax is on Codidact now | I agree that any site will take a long time to establish its identity, and I don't think removing the beta label early will change that. I just think that the beta label sometimes drives efforts from members to speed up that process, when letting it progress at a natural rate might be more beneficial. | |
| Aug 11, 2019 at 3:42 | comment | added | Monica Cellio Mod | On every beta site I've been part of, it took at least several months, and sometimes a few years, for the community to settle the key issues -- scope, what kind of support answers need, and the other essential questions of beta. Private beta works for initial seeding of a site, but many of the real issues only arise when there are more than a few dozen users. (Not my downvote.) | |
| Aug 10, 2019 at 0:53 | history | answered | trichoplax is on Codidact now | CC BY-SA 4.0 |