We’re rewarding the question askers & reputations are being recalculated! Read more.
6 replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
source | link

Gaining reputation from answering on Stack Overflow is getting increasingly difficult. There are many talented users to answer most questions within minutes, providing good enough answers immediately and editing in fuller answers within a very short time. Sometimes I feel like gaining reputation is somewhat of a race. However, I mean this in a good sense - it's a fun race, and it's great to have answers to most questions supplied most quickly.

But it saddens me to see how easily reputation can be gained by just asking questions. I know this has been discussed here on Meta Stack Overflow several times, but I want to highlight a pattern. Take a look at the Hottest Questions This WeekHottest Questions This Week (I tend to scan through this list on weekends). I don't want to point fingers, but many questions there have already been asked multiple times before. Stack Overflow veterans surely scan with their eyes, nodding - been there - over most of them. And yet, these questions gain lots of reputation. Some get closed in a couple of hours, but still manage to gain many votes until then.

This isn't a good situation, IMHO. Many members on Stack Overflow brandish high reputations and when you enter their profile it's a few 100s of questions, 3 downvoted answers on some semi-subjective topic, and nothing more. Is this the 4K user employers would like to hire based on high Stack Overflow reputation?

Perhaps to prove this, it's worthwhile to make an experiment - a user that asks semi-subjective questions over and over again, on topics which haven't been discussed in the past week or so. I have a feeling this can show some nice results, reputation-wise.

I know there are open issues on User Voice on this issue, but is someone planning to do anything about it? IMHO too much reputation is gained by asking questions, it is blatantly obvious, and it makes Stack Overflow a less fun place to be - as it partially invalidates the whole reputation system.


Why less fun? Consider this scenario:

Bob: So are you knowledgeable in programming?

Alice: Yeah, I have a Stack Overflow reputation of 8K!

Bob: Eh, I knew people get to such reputations just for asking hundreds of repeating questions there. So that doesn't count. Any other proof of your expertness?

Sounds surreal? I disagree. As an employer interviewing people quite often, such a scenario is real for me. I just value Stack Overflow reputation less because of this, period. Stack Overflow's administrators have to decide what they want out of it. Is it just a website for getting your questions answered? Great - it's a great one, indeed. But it appears they want to make something more, connecting to Careers, meaning reputation to actually be real. In such a case, allowing reputation farming from repeated questions is a self-defeating strategy.

Gaining reputation from answering on Stack Overflow is getting increasingly difficult. There are many talented users to answer most questions within minutes, providing good enough answers immediately and editing in fuller answers within a very short time. Sometimes I feel like gaining reputation is somewhat of a race. However, I mean this in a good sense - it's a fun race, and it's great to have answers to most questions supplied most quickly.

But it saddens me to see how easily reputation can be gained by just asking questions. I know this has been discussed here on Meta Stack Overflow several times, but I want to highlight a pattern. Take a look at the Hottest Questions This Week (I tend to scan through this list on weekends). I don't want to point fingers, but many questions there have already been asked multiple times before. Stack Overflow veterans surely scan with their eyes, nodding - been there - over most of them. And yet, these questions gain lots of reputation. Some get closed in a couple of hours, but still manage to gain many votes until then.

This isn't a good situation, IMHO. Many members on Stack Overflow brandish high reputations and when you enter their profile it's a few 100s of questions, 3 downvoted answers on some semi-subjective topic, and nothing more. Is this the 4K user employers would like to hire based on high Stack Overflow reputation?

Perhaps to prove this, it's worthwhile to make an experiment - a user that asks semi-subjective questions over and over again, on topics which haven't been discussed in the past week or so. I have a feeling this can show some nice results, reputation-wise.

I know there are open issues on User Voice on this issue, but is someone planning to do anything about it? IMHO too much reputation is gained by asking questions, it is blatantly obvious, and it makes Stack Overflow a less fun place to be - as it partially invalidates the whole reputation system.


Why less fun? Consider this scenario:

Bob: So are you knowledgeable in programming?

Alice: Yeah, I have a Stack Overflow reputation of 8K!

Bob: Eh, I knew people get to such reputations just for asking hundreds of repeating questions there. So that doesn't count. Any other proof of your expertness?

Sounds surreal? I disagree. As an employer interviewing people quite often, such a scenario is real for me. I just value Stack Overflow reputation less because of this, period. Stack Overflow's administrators have to decide what they want out of it. Is it just a website for getting your questions answered? Great - it's a great one, indeed. But it appears they want to make something more, connecting to Careers, meaning reputation to actually be real. In such a case, allowing reputation farming from repeated questions is a self-defeating strategy.

Gaining reputation from answering on Stack Overflow is getting increasingly difficult. There are many talented users to answer most questions within minutes, providing good enough answers immediately and editing in fuller answers within a very short time. Sometimes I feel like gaining reputation is somewhat of a race. However, I mean this in a good sense - it's a fun race, and it's great to have answers to most questions supplied most quickly.

But it saddens me to see how easily reputation can be gained by just asking questions. I know this has been discussed here on Meta Stack Overflow several times, but I want to highlight a pattern. Take a look at the Hottest Questions This Week (I tend to scan through this list on weekends). I don't want to point fingers, but many questions there have already been asked multiple times before. Stack Overflow veterans surely scan with their eyes, nodding - been there - over most of them. And yet, these questions gain lots of reputation. Some get closed in a couple of hours, but still manage to gain many votes until then.

This isn't a good situation, IMHO. Many members on Stack Overflow brandish high reputations and when you enter their profile it's a few 100s of questions, 3 downvoted answers on some semi-subjective topic, and nothing more. Is this the 4K user employers would like to hire based on high Stack Overflow reputation?

Perhaps to prove this, it's worthwhile to make an experiment - a user that asks semi-subjective questions over and over again, on topics which haven't been discussed in the past week or so. I have a feeling this can show some nice results, reputation-wise.

I know there are open issues on User Voice on this issue, but is someone planning to do anything about it? IMHO too much reputation is gained by asking questions, it is blatantly obvious, and it makes Stack Overflow a less fun place to be - as it partially invalidates the whole reputation system.


Why less fun? Consider this scenario:

Bob: So are you knowledgeable in programming?

Alice: Yeah, I have a Stack Overflow reputation of 8K!

Bob: Eh, I knew people get to such reputations just for asking hundreds of repeating questions there. So that doesn't count. Any other proof of your expertness?

Sounds surreal? I disagree. As an employer interviewing people quite often, such a scenario is real for me. I just value Stack Overflow reputation less because of this, period. Stack Overflow's administrators have to decide what they want out of it. Is it just a website for getting your questions answered? Great - it's a great one, indeed. But it appears they want to make something more, connecting to Careers, meaning reputation to actually be real. In such a case, allowing reputation farming from repeated questions is a self-defeating strategy.

    Post Closed as "duplicate" by gnat, hims056, Martijn Pieters, Lucifer, Hugo Dozois of
5 edited tags
| link
4 Expanded SO, rep, Meta, admins and Qs. Minor edit: grammar/spelling/case/punctation/etc.
source | link

The surest way to gain lots of repreputation on SO Stack Overflow- ask questions

Gaining repreputation from answering on SOStack Overflow is getting increasingly increasingly difficult. There are many talented users to answer answer most questions within minutes, providing good enough answers answers immediately and editing in fuller answers within a very very short time. Sometimes I feel like gaining repreputation is somewhat somewhat of a race. However, I mean this in a good sense - it's it's a fun race, and it's great to have answers to most questions questions supplied most quickly.

But it saddens me to see how easily repreputation can be gained by by just asking questions. I know this has been discussed here here on Meta Stack Overflow several times, but I want to highlight a pattern pattern. Take a look at the Hottest Questions This Week    (I tend to scan through this list on weekends). I don't want to to point fingers, but many questions there have already been asked asked multiple times before. SOStack Overflow veterans surely scan with their their eyes, nodding - been there - over most of them. And yet yet, these questions gain lots of repreputation. Some get closed closed in a couple of hours, but still manage to gain many votes votes until then.

This isn't a good situation, IMHO. Many members on SO brandishStack Overflow brandish high repsreputations and when you enter their profile it's a few few 100s of questions, 3 downvoted answers on some semi semi-subjective topic, and nothing more. Is this the 4K user employers employers would like to havehire based on high SO repStack Overflow reputation?

Perhaps to prove this, it's worthwhile to make an experiment    - a user that asks semi-subjective questions over and over again again, on topics which haven't been discussed in the past week week or so. I have a feeling this can show some nice results results, repreputation-wise.

I know there are open issues on User Voice on this issue, but but is someone planning to do anything about it? IMHO too much rep much reputation is gained by asking questions, it is blatantly obvious obvious, and it makes SOStack Overflow a less fun place to be - as it partially partially invalidates the whole reputation system.


Why less fun? Consider this scenario:

Bob: So are you knowledgeable in programming?  

Alice: Yeah, I have a Stack Overflow reputation of 8K!  

Bob: Eh, I knew people get to such repsreputations just for asking hundreds of repeating questions there. So that doesn't count. Any other proof of your expertness?

Sounds surreal? I disagree. As an employer interviewing people people quite often, such a scenario is real for me. I just value SO rep value Stack Overflow reputation less because of this, period period. SO's adminsStack Overflow's administrators have to decide what they want want out of it. Is it just a website for getting your Qs answeredquestions answered? Great - it's a great one, indeed. But it appears they they want to make something more, connecting to careersCareers, meaning rep meaning reputation to actually be real. In such a case, allowing rep allowing reputation farming from repeated questions is a self self-defeating strategy.

The surest way to gain lots of rep on SO - ask questions

Gaining rep from answering on SO is getting increasingly difficult. There are many talented users to answer most questions within minutes, providing good enough answers immediately and editing in fuller answers within a very short time. Sometimes I feel like gaining rep is somewhat of a race. However, I mean this in a good sense - it's a fun race, and it's great to have answers to most questions supplied most quickly.

But it saddens me to see how easily rep can be gained by just asking questions. I know this has been discussed here on Meta several times, but I want to highlight a pattern. Take a look at the Hottest Questions This Week  (I tend to scan through this list on weekends). I don't want to point fingers, but many questions there have already been asked multiple times before. SO veterans surely scan with their eyes, nodding - been there - over most of them. And yet, these questions gain lots of rep. Some get closed in a couple of hours, but still manage to gain many votes until then.

This isn't a good situation, IMHO. Many members on SO brandish high reps and when you enter their profile it's a few 100s of questions, 3 downvoted answers on some semi-subjective topic, and nothing more. Is this the 4K user employers would like to have based on high SO rep?

Perhaps to prove this, it's worthwhile to make an experiment  - a user that asks semi-subjective questions over and over again, on topics which haven't been discussed in the past week or so. I have a feeling this can show some nice results, rep-wise.

I know there are open issues on User Voice on this issue, but is someone planning to do anything about it? IMHO too much rep is gained by asking questions, it is blatantly obvious, and it makes SO a less fun place to be - as it partially invalidates the whole reputation system.


Why less fun? Consider this scenario:

Bob: So are you knowledgeable in programming?  

Alice: Yeah, I have a Stack Overflow reputation of 8K!  

Bob: Eh, I knew people get to such reps just for asking hundreds of repeating questions there. So that doesn't count. Any other proof of your expertness?

Sounds surreal? I disagree. As an employer interviewing people quite often, such a scenario is real for me. I just value SO rep less because of this, period. SO's admins have to decide what they want out of it. Is it just a website for getting your Qs answered? Great - it's a great one, indeed. But it appears they want to make something more, connecting to careers, meaning rep to actually be real. In such case, allowing rep farming from repeated questions is a self-defeating strategy.

The surest way to gain lots of reputation on Stack Overflow- ask questions

Gaining reputation from answering on Stack Overflow is getting increasingly difficult. There are many talented users to answer most questions within minutes, providing good enough answers immediately and editing in fuller answers within a very short time. Sometimes I feel like gaining reputation is somewhat of a race. However, I mean this in a good sense - it's a fun race, and it's great to have answers to most questions supplied most quickly.

But it saddens me to see how easily reputation can be gained by just asking questions. I know this has been discussed here on Meta Stack Overflow several times, but I want to highlight a pattern. Take a look at the Hottest Questions This Week  (I tend to scan through this list on weekends). I don't want to point fingers, but many questions there have already been asked multiple times before. Stack Overflow veterans surely scan with their eyes, nodding - been there - over most of them. And yet, these questions gain lots of reputation. Some get closed in a couple of hours, but still manage to gain many votes until then.

This isn't a good situation, IMHO. Many members on Stack Overflow brandish high reputations and when you enter their profile it's a few 100s of questions, 3 downvoted answers on some semi-subjective topic, and nothing more. Is this the 4K user employers would like to hire based on high Stack Overflow reputation?

Perhaps to prove this, it's worthwhile to make an experiment  - a user that asks semi-subjective questions over and over again, on topics which haven't been discussed in the past week or so. I have a feeling this can show some nice results, reputation-wise.

I know there are open issues on User Voice on this issue, but is someone planning to do anything about it? IMHO too much reputation is gained by asking questions, it is blatantly obvious, and it makes Stack Overflow a less fun place to be - as it partially invalidates the whole reputation system.


Why less fun? Consider this scenario:

Bob: So are you knowledgeable in programming?

Alice: Yeah, I have a Stack Overflow reputation of 8K!

Bob: Eh, I knew people get to such reputations just for asking hundreds of repeating questions there. So that doesn't count. Any other proof of your expertness?

Sounds surreal? I disagree. As an employer interviewing people quite often, such a scenario is real for me. I just value Stack Overflow reputation less because of this, period. Stack Overflow's administrators have to decide what they want out of it. Is it just a website for getting your questions answered? Great - it's a great one, indeed. But it appears they want to make something more, connecting to Careers, meaning reputation to actually be real. In such a case, allowing reputation farming from repeated questions is a self-defeating strategy.

3 deleted 15 characters in body
source | link
2 added 521 characters in body; added 336 characters in body
source | link
1 Post Made Community Wiki
source | link