Skip to main content
42 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Jan 15, 2020 at 1:13 history edited KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0
added 257 characters in body
Oct 19, 2019 at 22:26 comment added hayd @KorvinStarmast I strongly suspect they do have a duty of care and, sadly, Monica will have to seek outside council in order to redress. I don't think there's any coming back from that (i.e. rejoining as a moderator) so understand why she'd want to avoid this, but considering SO Inc's [lack of/poor] response it seems inevitable.
Oct 19, 2019 at 12:49 comment added KorvinStarmast @hayd I made an edit, though as i think through what I am trying to get across, I realize that the duty of care issue is a topic that requires its own answer. It's also a bit more of a legalistic term than what I anchored this answer on. Indeed, I think that a part of the general negative reaction to this situation is the feeling that the duty of care has been either overlooked, abandoned, or never accepted by the organization. If Monica has been harmed professionally by this, a formal course of redress or remedy will, I suspect, focus on the duty of care being unfulfilled.
Oct 19, 2019 at 12:45 history edited KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0
added 203 characters in body
Oct 19, 2019 at 12:40 comment added KorvinStarmast @hayd I think you are correct in the general sense. I mentioned something related to that briefly in re the non profit that my brother works at, but I think I'll add that term since it touches on the relationship point.
Oct 19, 2019 at 3:27 comment added hayd I think there is a duty of care, i.e. a responsibility, of the company rather than a right of the volunteer.
Oct 9, 2019 at 21:24 history edited gnat CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Oct 9, 2019 at 12:16 comment added KorvinStarmast @aparente001 Apparently, not hyperbole
Oct 9, 2019 at 11:00 history edited KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 34 characters in body
Oct 8, 2019 at 19:50 comment added KorvinStarmast @aparente001 I had no contact with community managers, nor did I need any, nor did I desire any I was aware that if I wanted to, I could talk to a community manager, but I felt no need and no desire to do so. A month off of that SE did me no harm. Whereas, Monica was subjected to what I see as a public shaming (and I am sorry if I am guilty of hyperbole).
Oct 8, 2019 at 18:14 comment added aparente001 @Chris - Seems like you could take that response as an indication that informal mediation was unsuccessful -- if you wanted to submit a test case with JAMS (see meta.stackexchange.com/a/334482/287826).
Oct 8, 2019 at 17:58 comment added Chris @aparente001 I used that email link, and finally got a response that basically said "if you don't like it here, leave"
Oct 8, 2019 at 17:38 comment added aparente001 @Chris - Please see my comment to Korvin, and also you may want to consider meta.stackexchange.com/a/334482/287826
Oct 8, 2019 at 17:34 comment added aparente001 @KorvinStarmast - There is a way to contact the staff-level moderation people -- the "Contact" button in the footer. It's not well publicized, there can be a delay, and it doesn't always result in anything meaningful, but it is worth a try in my experience.
Oct 8, 2019 at 16:06 comment added KorvinStarmast @Chris I served a one month suspension two years ago at an SE site and there were two ways for me to reach the diamond mods. One was a discrete chat, the other was an email outlet that was possible due to myself and a diamond mod having previously shared an email with each other. I had no contact with community managers, nor did I need any, nor did I desire any. But it's interesting to think through the matter of "how to you contact someone who won't answer your calls" as a problem.
Oct 8, 2019 at 16:01 comment added Chris I was suspended during all this mess, I am guessing for my comments expressing dissatisfaction? I have not had any response or interaction, no warnings, no information about why I was suspended rather than warned as described in the CoC. No email responses. It doesn't bode well for any user getting any kind of satisfactory conversation about issues. They won't converse with their moderators or their users, but plan to increase the ways in which they can run afoul of rules and wind up in a position to need a conversation in the first place.
Oct 8, 2019 at 15:47 history edited KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Oct 8, 2019 at 15:18 history edited KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0
added 270 characters in body
Oct 8, 2019 at 3:46 comment added KorvinStarmast @fredsbend well shoot, and I thought I was doing so well. Back to the drawing board .. :-)
Oct 6, 2019 at 16:35 history edited KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0
added 13 characters in body
Oct 6, 2019 at 16:29 history edited KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0
added 13 characters in body
Oct 6, 2019 at 2:44 comment added user212646 Your rights are depreciated. Stand by while we collect your new ones.
Oct 5, 2019 at 20:34 comment added KorvinStarmast @JohnDvorak Sorry, I should have added that on first usage in the original post.
Oct 5, 2019 at 20:30 comment added John Dvorak I have asked Google what "PTB" means and it said "pulmonary tuberculosis". Thank you for clarifying this point before I even asked.
Oct 5, 2019 at 20:29 history edited KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0
added 3 characters in body
Oct 5, 2019 at 20:24 history edited KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0
added 3 characters in body
Oct 5, 2019 at 19:05 comment added KorvinStarmast @Richard I tried to capture that point with The PTB do the math, and they look at the size of the volunteer base that potentially offers them replacements. And they like their odds
Oct 5, 2019 at 19:03 comment added Richard You may also want to note that there are no shortage of people who'd quite like to do the mod's jobs on most of the sites from which they've resigned. "I quit" has bugger all leverage when ten people would step up to do your job tomorrow, for free.
Oct 5, 2019 at 18:59 comment added KorvinStarmast @aparente001 In re your last sentence: yep, that is a best practice.
Oct 5, 2019 at 18:57 comment added aparente001 Well, let's just see what happens. Right now I hear thundering silence from corporate leadership. That may mean there's some hope for them to go back to the drawing board. I've learned that in a conflict it is always good to leave a graceful way out for the other party, in case they have a change of heart.
Oct 5, 2019 at 18:50 comment added KorvinStarmast @aparente001 to have a conversation/mediation takes two parties. The "we are not going to re-litigate this" position is not one that demonstrates being open to being a party to such a process. I too wish it were otherwise.
Oct 5, 2019 at 18:48 history edited KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0
added 201 characters in body
Oct 5, 2019 at 18:31 history edited KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0
added 165 characters in body
Oct 5, 2019 at 18:26 history edited KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0
added 215 characters in body
Oct 5, 2019 at 16:25 history edited KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0
added 42 characters in body
Oct 5, 2019 at 16:21 history edited KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0
added 79 characters in body
Oct 5, 2019 at 14:26 history edited KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 2 characters in body
Oct 5, 2019 at 4:44 comment added aparente001 Mediation isn't just for collective bargaining in the workplace. It can be with anyone you have a conflict with -- maybe your neighbor's teenage son practices saxophone with the windows open every evening right when you're trying to get your toddler to bed. A mediator can help you have a productive conversation with your neighbor.
Oct 5, 2019 at 2:58 history edited KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0
added 32 characters in body
Oct 5, 2019 at 2:53 history edited KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0
added 32 characters in body
Oct 5, 2019 at 2:46 history answered KorvinStarmast CC BY-SA 4.0