3 Grammar - better wording
source | link

This is absolutely a great idea, for both Questions and Answers. User information is not in any way useful in generating quality questions or responses or deciding the appropriateness of those questions and responses. It invites bandwagoning and prejudice. This feature would greatly improve the quality of our metrics and greatly curb many bias-related challenges assailing our moderators..

Users on this site are here to make quality control decisions, and none of those decisions pertaining to the quality of a question or answer involve reputation or avatar or username or badges. Below is a complete list of the proper factors we should consider in our QC efforts:

Questions:

Upvote = "This question shows research effort; it is useful and clear."
Downvote = "This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful"

- Flagging reasons: - Spam: Exists only to promote a product or service, does not disclose the author's affiliation.

  • rude or abusive: A reasonable person would find this content inappropriate for respectful discourse.

  • should be closed...: This question is completely unclear, incomplete, overly-broad, primarily opinion-based or is not about the software that powers the Stack Exchange network as described in the help center, and it is unlikely to be fixed via editing.

  • a duplicate...: This question has been asked before and already has an answer.

  • in need of moderator intervention: A problem not listed above that requires action by a moderator. Be specific and detailed!

Answers:

Upvote = "This answer is useful"
Downvote = "This answer is not useful"

- Flagging reasons:

  • rude or abusive: A reasonable person would find this content inappropriate for respectful discourse.

  • not an answer: This was posted as an answer, but it does not attempt to answer the question. It should possibly be an edit, a comment, another question, or deleted altogether.

Note the clearly missing user name, reputation, and badges? Those things are only noise in the voting process.

More precisely, this should apply to new posts.

I believe established posts should afford users an opportunity to "brag" a bit. All new posts should be anonymous - questions and answers - however after it has become established the user info should be proudly displayed.

What is established? That would be a matter for discussion. I imagine criteria include:

  1. How many users have viewed the post?

  2. How many votes has the post received?

  3. How much time has passed since posting?

  4. Has the post been accepted by the OP (for answers)?

Handling comments: Certainly comments want to address the OP. In this case, anonymous posts receive a generic user/bot icon until it is established.

Fuzzy user display: A vague reputation gauge may be useful which still does not disclose the poster identity. But a reputation scale of 1-5 may make voters more comfortable. I still don't advocate this until someone makes clear how thisthe "reputation" metric helps sitecontributes to vote quality.

This is absolutely a great idea, for both Questions and Answers. User information is not in any way useful in generating quality questions or responses or deciding the appropriateness of those questions and responses. It invites bandwagoning and prejudice. This feature would greatly improve the quality of our metrics and greatly curb many bias-related challenges assailing our moderators..

Users on this site are here to make quality control decisions, and none of those decisions pertaining to the quality of a question or answer involve reputation or avatar or username or badges. Below is a complete list of the proper factors we should consider in our QC efforts:

Questions:

Upvote = "This question shows research effort; it is useful and clear."
Downvote = "This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful"

- Flagging reasons: - Spam: Exists only to promote a product or service, does not disclose the author's affiliation.

  • rude or abusive: A reasonable person would find this content inappropriate for respectful discourse.

  • should be closed...: This question is completely unclear, incomplete, overly-broad, primarily opinion-based or is not about the software that powers the Stack Exchange network as described in the help center, and it is unlikely to be fixed via editing.

  • a duplicate...: This question has been asked before and already has an answer.

  • in need of moderator intervention: A problem not listed above that requires action by a moderator. Be specific and detailed!

Answers:

Upvote = "This answer is useful"
Downvote = "This answer is not useful"

- Flagging reasons:

  • rude or abusive: A reasonable person would find this content inappropriate for respectful discourse.

  • not an answer: This was posted as an answer, but it does not attempt to answer the question. It should possibly be an edit, a comment, another question, or deleted altogether.

Note the clearly missing user name, reputation, and badges? Those things are only noise in the voting process.

More precisely, this should apply to new posts.

I believe established posts should afford users an opportunity to "brag" a bit. All new posts should be anonymous - questions and answers - however after it has become established the user info should be proudly displayed.

What is established? That would be a matter for discussion. I imagine criteria include:

  1. How many users have viewed the post?

  2. How many votes has the post received?

  3. How much time has passed since posting?

  4. Has the post been accepted by the OP (for answers)?

Handling comments: Certainly comments want to address the OP. In this case, anonymous posts receive a generic user/bot icon until it is established.

Fuzzy user display: A vague reputation gauge may be useful which still does not disclose the poster identity. But a reputation scale of 1-5 may make voters more comfortable. I still don't advocate this until someone makes clear how this metric helps site quality.

This is absolutely a great idea, for both Questions and Answers. User information is not in any way useful in generating quality questions or responses or deciding the appropriateness of those questions and responses. It invites bandwagoning and prejudice. This feature would greatly improve the quality of our metrics and greatly curb many bias-related challenges assailing our moderators..

Users on this site are here to make quality control decisions, and none of those decisions pertaining to the quality of a question or answer involve reputation or avatar or username or badges. Below is a complete list of the proper factors we should consider in our QC efforts:

Questions:

Upvote = "This question shows research effort; it is useful and clear."
Downvote = "This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful"

- Flagging reasons: - Spam: Exists only to promote a product or service, does not disclose the author's affiliation.

  • rude or abusive: A reasonable person would find this content inappropriate for respectful discourse.

  • should be closed...: This question is completely unclear, incomplete, overly-broad, primarily opinion-based or is not about the software that powers the Stack Exchange network as described in the help center, and it is unlikely to be fixed via editing.

  • a duplicate...: This question has been asked before and already has an answer.

  • in need of moderator intervention: A problem not listed above that requires action by a moderator. Be specific and detailed!

Answers:

Upvote = "This answer is useful"
Downvote = "This answer is not useful"

- Flagging reasons:

  • rude or abusive: A reasonable person would find this content inappropriate for respectful discourse.

  • not an answer: This was posted as an answer, but it does not attempt to answer the question. It should possibly be an edit, a comment, another question, or deleted altogether.

Note the clearly missing user name, reputation, and badges? Those things are only noise in the voting process.

More precisely, this should apply to new posts.

I believe established posts should afford users an opportunity to "brag" a bit. All new posts should be anonymous - questions and answers - however after it has become established the user info should be proudly displayed.

What is established? That would be a matter for discussion. I imagine criteria include:

  1. How many users have viewed the post?

  2. How many votes has the post received?

  3. How much time has passed since posting?

  4. Has the post been accepted by the OP (for answers)?

Handling comments: Certainly comments want to address the OP. In this case, anonymous posts receive a generic user/bot icon until it is established.

Fuzzy user display: A vague reputation gauge may be useful which still does not disclose the poster identity. But a reputation scale of 1-5 may make voters more comfortable. I still don't advocate this until someone makes clear how the "reputation" metric contributes to vote quality.

2 added 70 characters in body
source | link

This is absolutely a great idea, for both Questions and Answers. User information is not in any way useful in generating quality questions or responses or deciding the appropriateness of those questions and responses.

Anonymous questionsIt invites bandwagoning and prejudice. This feature would certainly reducegreatly improve the workloadquality of our moderators by heading off grudgesmetrics and usergreatly curb many bias before it even manifests itself-related challenges assailing our moderators..

Users on this site are here to make quality control decisions, and none of those decisions pertaining to the quality of a question or answer involve reputation or avatar or username or badges. For reference, below are allBelow is a complete list of the reasonsproper factors we act on a postshould consider in our QC efforts:

Questions:

Upvote = "This question shows research effort; it is useful and clear."
Downvote = "This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful"

- Flagging reasons: - Spam: Exists only to promote a product or service, does not disclose the author's affiliation.

  • rude or abusive: A reasonable person would find this content inappropriate for respectful discourse.

  • should be closed...: This question is completely unclear, incomplete, overly-broad, primarily opinion-based or is not about the software that powers the Stack Exchange network as described in the help center, and it is unlikely to be fixed via editing.

  • a duplicate...: This question has been asked before and already has an answer.

  • in need of moderator intervention: A problem not listed above that requires action by a moderator. Be specific and detailed!

Answers:

Upvote = "This answer is useful"
Downvote = "This answer is not useful"

- Flagging reasons:

  • rude or abusive: A reasonable person would find this content inappropriate for respectful discourse.

  • not an answer: This was posted as an answer, but it does not attempt to answer the question. It should possibly be an edit, a comment, another question, or deleted altogether.

Note the clearly missing user name, reputation, and badges? Those things are only noise in the voting process.

More precisely, this should apply to new posts.

I believe established posts should afford users an opportunity to "brag" a bit. All new posts should be anonymous - questions and answers - however after it has become established the user info should be proudly displayed.

What is established? That would be a matter for discussion. I imagine criteria include:

  1. How many users have viewed the post?

  2. How many votes has the post received?

  3. How much time has passed since posting?

  4. Has the post been accepted by the OP (for answers)?

Handling comments: Certainly comments want to address the OP. In this case, anonymous posts receive a generic user/bot icon until it is established.

Fuzzy user display: A vague reputation gauge may be useful which still does not disclose the poster identity. But a reputation scale of 1-5 may make voters more comfortable. I still don't advocate this until someone makes clear how this metric helps site quality.

This is absolutely a great idea, for both Questions and Answers. User information is not in any way useful in generating quality questions or responses or deciding the appropriateness of those questions and responses.

Anonymous questions would certainly reduce the workload of our moderators by heading off grudges and user bias before it even manifests itself.

Users on this site are here to make decisions, and none of those decisions pertaining to the quality of a question or answer involve reputation or avatar or username or badges. For reference, below are all the reasons we act on a post:

Questions:

Upvote = "This question shows research effort; it is useful and clear."
Downvote = "This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful"

- Flagging reasons: - Spam: Exists only to promote a product or service, does not disclose the author's affiliation.

  • rude or abusive: A reasonable person would find this content inappropriate for respectful discourse.

  • should be closed...: This question is completely unclear, incomplete, overly-broad, primarily opinion-based or is not about the software that powers the Stack Exchange network as described in the help center, and it is unlikely to be fixed via editing.

  • a duplicate...: This question has been asked before and already has an answer.

  • in need of moderator intervention: A problem not listed above that requires action by a moderator. Be specific and detailed!

Answers:

Upvote = "This answer is useful"
Downvote = "This answer is not useful"

- Flagging reasons:

  • rude or abusive: A reasonable person would find this content inappropriate for respectful discourse.

  • not an answer: This was posted as an answer, but it does not attempt to answer the question. It should possibly be an edit, a comment, another question, or deleted altogether.

Note the clearly missing user name, reputation, and badges? Those things are only noise in the voting process.

More precisely, this should apply to new posts.

I believe established posts should afford users an opportunity to "brag" a bit. All new posts should be anonymous - questions and answers - however after it has become established the user info should be proudly displayed.

What is established? That would be a matter for discussion. I imagine criteria include:

  1. How many users have viewed the post?

  2. How many votes has the post received?

  3. How much time has passed since posting?

  4. Has the post been accepted by the OP (for answers)?

Handling comments: Certainly comments want to address the OP. In this case, anonymous posts receive a generic user/bot icon until it is established.

Fuzzy user display: A vague reputation gauge may be useful which still does not disclose the poster identity. But a reputation scale of 1-5 may make voters more comfortable. I still don't advocate this until someone makes clear how this metric helps site quality.

This is absolutely a great idea, for both Questions and Answers. User information is not in any way useful in generating quality questions or responses or deciding the appropriateness of those questions and responses. It invites bandwagoning and prejudice. This feature would greatly improve the quality of our metrics and greatly curb many bias-related challenges assailing our moderators..

Users on this site are here to make quality control decisions, and none of those decisions pertaining to the quality of a question or answer involve reputation or avatar or username or badges. Below is a complete list of the proper factors we should consider in our QC efforts:

Questions:

Upvote = "This question shows research effort; it is useful and clear."
Downvote = "This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful"

- Flagging reasons: - Spam: Exists only to promote a product or service, does not disclose the author's affiliation.

  • rude or abusive: A reasonable person would find this content inappropriate for respectful discourse.

  • should be closed...: This question is completely unclear, incomplete, overly-broad, primarily opinion-based or is not about the software that powers the Stack Exchange network as described in the help center, and it is unlikely to be fixed via editing.

  • a duplicate...: This question has been asked before and already has an answer.

  • in need of moderator intervention: A problem not listed above that requires action by a moderator. Be specific and detailed!

Answers:

Upvote = "This answer is useful"
Downvote = "This answer is not useful"

- Flagging reasons:

  • rude or abusive: A reasonable person would find this content inappropriate for respectful discourse.

  • not an answer: This was posted as an answer, but it does not attempt to answer the question. It should possibly be an edit, a comment, another question, or deleted altogether.

Note the clearly missing user name, reputation, and badges? Those things are only noise in the voting process.

More precisely, this should apply to new posts.

I believe established posts should afford users an opportunity to "brag" a bit. All new posts should be anonymous - questions and answers - however after it has become established the user info should be proudly displayed.

What is established? That would be a matter for discussion. I imagine criteria include:

  1. How many users have viewed the post?

  2. How many votes has the post received?

  3. How much time has passed since posting?

  4. Has the post been accepted by the OP (for answers)?

Handling comments: Certainly comments want to address the OP. In this case, anonymous posts receive a generic user/bot icon until it is established.

Fuzzy user display: A vague reputation gauge may be useful which still does not disclose the poster identity. But a reputation scale of 1-5 may make voters more comfortable. I still don't advocate this until someone makes clear how this metric helps site quality.

1
source | link

This is absolutely a great idea, for both Questions and Answers. User information is not in any way useful in generating quality questions or responses or deciding the appropriateness of those questions and responses.

Anonymous questions would certainly reduce the workload of our moderators by heading off grudges and user bias before it even manifests itself.

Users on this site are here to make decisions, and none of those decisions pertaining to the quality of a question or answer involve reputation or avatar or username or badges. For reference, below are all the reasons we act on a post:

Questions:

Upvote = "This question shows research effort; it is useful and clear."
Downvote = "This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful"

- Flagging reasons: - Spam: Exists only to promote a product or service, does not disclose the author's affiliation.

  • rude or abusive: A reasonable person would find this content inappropriate for respectful discourse.

  • should be closed...: This question is completely unclear, incomplete, overly-broad, primarily opinion-based or is not about the software that powers the Stack Exchange network as described in the help center, and it is unlikely to be fixed via editing.

  • a duplicate...: This question has been asked before and already has an answer.

  • in need of moderator intervention: A problem not listed above that requires action by a moderator. Be specific and detailed!

Answers:

Upvote = "This answer is useful"
Downvote = "This answer is not useful"

- Flagging reasons:

  • rude or abusive: A reasonable person would find this content inappropriate for respectful discourse.

  • not an answer: This was posted as an answer, but it does not attempt to answer the question. It should possibly be an edit, a comment, another question, or deleted altogether.

Note the clearly missing user name, reputation, and badges? Those things are only noise in the voting process.

More precisely, this should apply to new posts.

I believe established posts should afford users an opportunity to "brag" a bit. All new posts should be anonymous - questions and answers - however after it has become established the user info should be proudly displayed.

What is established? That would be a matter for discussion. I imagine criteria include:

  1. How many users have viewed the post?

  2. How many votes has the post received?

  3. How much time has passed since posting?

  4. Has the post been accepted by the OP (for answers)?

Handling comments: Certainly comments want to address the OP. In this case, anonymous posts receive a generic user/bot icon until it is established.

Fuzzy user display: A vague reputation gauge may be useful which still does not disclose the poster identity. But a reputation scale of 1-5 may make voters more comfortable. I still don't advocate this until someone makes clear how this metric helps site quality.