Skip to main content

No, it's not you. This is just a natural consequence of Stack Overflow shifting the focus from a high quality-quality library of knowledge towards quantity, ei.ge. attracting as many users as possible while at the same time driving away the people who used to curate the content and wrote good answers.

Looking at some stats, you should be lucky to still get any answers, because the number of questions and answered questions is drifting apart (please note that the results older than 365 days are effectedaffected by undergoing roomba, thus artificially improving answer rate and unanswered count, thanks to Robert Longson for pointing this out, but the decline in the answered count is still impressive).

https://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/1136522/answered-unanswered-questions-by-month#graph

Enter image description here

No, it's not you. This is just a natural consequence of Stack Overflow shifting the focus from a high quality library of knowledge towards quantity, e.g. attracting as many users as possible while at the same time driving away the people who used to curate the content and wrote good answers.

Looking at some stats, you should be lucky to still get any answers, because the number of questions and answered questions is drifting apart (please note that the results older than 365 days are effected by undergoing roomba, thus artificially improving answer rate and unanswered count, thanks to Robert Longson for pointing this out, but the decline in the answered count is still impressive).

https://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/1136522/answered-unanswered-questions-by-month#graph

Enter image description here

No, it's not you. This is just a natural consequence of Stack Overflow shifting the focus from a high-quality library of knowledge towards quantity, i.e. attracting as many users as possible while at the same time driving away the people who used to curate the content and wrote good answers.

Looking at some stats, you should be lucky to still get any answers, because the number of questions and answered questions is drifting apart (please note that the results older than 365 days are affected by undergoing roomba, thus artificially improving answer rate and unanswered count, thanks to Robert Longson for pointing this out, but the decline in the answered count is still impressive).

https://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/1136522/answered-unanswered-questions-by-month#graph

Enter image description here

(While we are at it.) - yes, I did not bump it (that was by an answer edit!) [<http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance> (the last section)].
Source Link

No, it's not you. This is just a natural consequence of stackoverflowStack Overflow shifting the focus from a high quality library of knowledge towards quantity, e.g. attracting as many users as possible while at the same time driving away the people who used to curate the content and wrote good answers. 

Looking at some stats, you should be lucky to still get any answers, because the number of questions and answered questions is drifting apart (please note that the results older than 365 days are effected by undergoing roomba, thus artificially improving answer rate and unanswered count, thanks to Robert Longson for pointing this out, but the decline in the answered count is still impressive).

https://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/1136522/answered-unanswered-questions-by-month#graph

enter image description hereEnter image description here

No, it's not you. This is just a natural consequence of stackoverflow shifting the focus from a high quality library of knowledge towards quantity, e.g. attracting as many users as possible while at the same time driving away the people who used to curate the content and wrote good answers. Looking at some stats, you should be lucky to still get any answers, because the number of questions and answered questions is drifting apart (please note that the results older than 365 days are effected by undergoing roomba, thus artificially improving answer rate and unanswered count, thanks to Robert Longson for pointing this out, but the decline in the answered count is still impressive)

https://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/1136522/answered-unanswered-questions-by-month#graph

enter image description here

No, it's not you. This is just a natural consequence of Stack Overflow shifting the focus from a high quality library of knowledge towards quantity, e.g. attracting as many users as possible while at the same time driving away the people who used to curate the content and wrote good answers. 

Looking at some stats, you should be lucky to still get any answers, because the number of questions and answered questions is drifting apart (please note that the results older than 365 days are effected by undergoing roomba, thus artificially improving answer rate and unanswered count, thanks to Robert Longson for pointing this out, but the decline in the answered count is still impressive).

https://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/1136522/answered-unanswered-questions-by-month#graph

Enter image description here

added 72 characters in body
Source Link

No, it's not you. This is just a natural consequence of stackoverflow shifting the focus from a high quality library of knowledge towards quantity, e.g. attracting as many users as possible while at the same time driving away the people who used to curate the content and wrote good answers. Looking at some stats, you should be lucky to still get any answers, because the number of questions and answered questions is drifting apart (please note that the results for the lastolder than 365 days are effected by not yet undergoing roomba, as noted bythus artificially improving answer rate and unanswered count, thanks to Robert Longson for pointing this out, but the decline in the answered count is still impressive)

https://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/1136522/answered-unanswered-questions-by-month#graph

enter image description here

No, it's not you. This is just a natural consequence of stackoverflow shifting the focus from a high quality library of knowledge towards quantity, e.g. attracting as many users as possible while at the same time driving away the people who used to curate the content and wrote good answers. Looking at some stats, you should be lucky to still get any answers, because the number of questions and answered questions is drifting apart (please note that the results for the last 365 days are effected by not yet undergoing roomba, as noted by Robert Longson, but the decline in the answered count is still impressive)

https://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/1136522/answered-unanswered-questions-by-month#graph

enter image description here

No, it's not you. This is just a natural consequence of stackoverflow shifting the focus from a high quality library of knowledge towards quantity, e.g. attracting as many users as possible while at the same time driving away the people who used to curate the content and wrote good answers. Looking at some stats, you should be lucky to still get any answers, because the number of questions and answered questions is drifting apart (please note that the results older than 365 days are effected by undergoing roomba, thus artificially improving answer rate and unanswered count, thanks to Robert Longson for pointing this out, but the decline in the answered count is still impressive)

https://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/1136522/answered-unanswered-questions-by-month#graph

enter image description here

added 367 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading