Timeline for Why is SE removing links and community ads about a legal fund campaign?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2020 at 18:22 | comment | added | Robbie Goodwin | Sorry, Juan M; did you not notice, comments such as "Under guidance from our legal team, we are not able to respond…" is pretty-much diametrically opposed to "… we want to be as transparent as we can"? Do you think it's fun to insult SE Users that way, or what? Worse, Juan, "This has taken a legal turn and we will not be answering any questions…" will prolly be interpreted by almost every reader as meaning "We don't see how we have a leg to stand on". Did you not realise that? Not personally? Not with your team of communications and legal experts? Not at all? Oops! | |
| Jan 21, 2020 at 12:17 | comment | added | HQSantos | I guess we can see in the votes of this answer how the community feels about those horrible changes just to cover what happened to monica | |
| Dec 25, 2019 at 3:58 | comment | added | LarsH | "Under guidance from our legal team, we are not able ..." - this is obviously untrue. Guidance does not prevent action. You have been advised that it's not in the company's interest to respond to anything regarding Monica's situation. Don't compound dishonesty by claiming "we are not able." | |
| Dec 12, 2019 at 18:54 | comment | added | EJoshuaS - Stand with Ukraine | I know that this is an old post, but can you explain how this impacts the new moderator review process? | |
| Nov 14, 2019 at 21:05 | history | edited | Juan MStaff | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 204 characters in body
|
| Nov 14, 2019 at 18:38 | comment | added | Zoe - Save the data dump | Cross-posting from the question just in case you're the one to ask: "My question earlier was serious, just in case that wasn't obvious. I'd like a yes/no answer, and you can keep the specifics beyond that to yourself, but I need to know whether that battle is worth giving up or not. The lack of a reply in combination with this post actually makes it seem more likely that's the case anyway." | |
| Nov 14, 2019 at 16:06 | comment | added | NathanOliver | This answer doesn't address the issue over removing links from peoples profiles. Is that really being done and if so, how is that being justified? | |
| Nov 14, 2019 at 16:05 | vote | accept | JNatStaffMod | ||
| Nov 14, 2019 at 15:43 | comment | added | Mad Scientist | Your explanation doesn't cover why the links will be removed from user profiles. Ads are entirely understandable, user profiles will be far more controversial. | |
| Nov 14, 2019 at 15:18 | comment | added | gerrit | I hope that "anything regarding" will not be interpreted any more broadly than strictly necessary. | |
| Nov 14, 2019 at 15:10 | comment | added | CptEric | Does this also include the links to the letters from the moderators and the lavender community? | |
| Nov 14, 2019 at 15:06 | comment | added | Mad Scientist | you might want to clarify where links to legal fund campaigns are allowed and where not, as I'm not sure I understand this correctly. Is this only about community ads, or also posts, comments, chat and user profiles? | |
| Nov 14, 2019 at 15:03 | history | answered | Juan MStaff | CC BY-SA 4.0 |