Skip to main content
Meta Stack Exchange

Return to Answer

Active reading. [<http://stackoverflow.com/legal/trademark-guidance> (the last section)].
Source Link
This_is_NOT_a_forum
This_is_NOT_a_forum
  • 6.7k
  • 4
  • 37
  • 55

Yes, the community should be able to come up with something better. The Loop has basically three questions that concern StackOverflowStack Overflow (ignoring the questions asking for person details). Three questions are hardly enough to get constructive feedback and are unlikely to provide SE with new information.

Personally I am really surprised by the Loop. This was announced with much fanfare, it was even delayed to improve it and we ended up with eight questions, with some question lacking basic quality control. It reeks of sheer panic.

Yes, the community should be able to come up with something better. The Loop has basically three questions that concern StackOverflow (ignoring the questions asking for person details). Three questions are hardly enough to get constructive feedback and are unlikely to provide SE with new information.

Personally I am really surprised by the Loop. This was announced with much fanfare, it was even delayed to improve it and we ended up with eight questions, with some question lacking basic quality control. It reeks of sheer panic.

Yes, the community should be able to come up with something better. The Loop has basically three questions that concern Stack Overflow (ignoring the questions asking for person details). Three questions are hardly enough to get constructive feedback and are unlikely to provide SE with new information.

Personally I am really surprised by the Loop. This was announced with much fanfare, it was even delayed to improve it and we ended up with eight questions, with some question lacking basic quality control. It reeks of sheer panic.

Source Link
Alex
Alex
  • 1.6k
  • 13
  • 18

Yes, the community should be able to come up with something better. The Loop has basically three questions that concern StackOverflow (ignoring the questions asking for person details). Three questions are hardly enough to get constructive feedback and are unlikely to provide SE with new information.

Personally I am really surprised by the Loop. This was announced with much fanfare, it was even delayed to improve it and we ended up with eight questions, with some question lacking basic quality control. It reeks of sheer panic.