Skip to main content
part of "MSO questions without required tags" cleanup; minor sp/gr
Source Link
Pops
  • 69k
  • 34
  • 226
  • 359

We Is it intended that we penalise people for asking questions nobody else is interested in: Is this Intended ?

If someone asks a question, and gets no answer after a while, they get suggesteda suggestion from the system to raiseoffer a bounty.

After a week, the bounty expires.

If there was a useful answer, then the OP loses rep.

So the scenario is really, the OP loses rep for asking questions that nobody else is interested in.

Is this intended  ? Should we encourage a monoculture  ?

We penalise people for asking questions nobody else is interested in: Is this Intended ?

If someone asks a question, and gets no answer after while, they get suggested to raise a bounty.

After a week the bounty expires.

If there was useful answer, then the OP loses rep.

So the scenario is really, the OP loses rep for asking questions that nobody else is interested in.

Is this intended  ? Should we encourage a monoculture  ?

Is it intended that we penalise people for asking questions nobody else is interested in?

If someone asks a question, and gets no answer after a while, they get a suggestion from the system to offer a bounty.

After a week, the bounty expires.

If there was a useful answer, then the OP loses rep.

So the scenario is really, the OP loses rep for asking questions that nobody else is interested in.

Is this intended? Should we encourage a monoculture?

deleted 1 characters in body
Source Link

If someone asks a question, and gets no answer after while, they get suggested to raise a bounty.

After a week the bounty expires.

If there was useful answer, then the OP loses rep.

So the scenario is really, the OP loosesloses rep for asking questions that nobody else is interested in.

Is this intended ? Should we encourage a monoculture ?

If someone asks a question, and gets no answer after while, they get suggested to raise a bounty.

After a week the bounty expires.

If there was useful answer, then the OP loses rep.

So the scenario is really, the OP looses rep for asking questions that nobody else is interested in.

Is this intended ? Should we encourage a monoculture ?

If someone asks a question, and gets no answer after while, they get suggested to raise a bounty.

After a week the bounty expires.

If there was useful answer, then the OP loses rep.

So the scenario is really, the OP loses rep for asking questions that nobody else is interested in.

Is this intended ? Should we encourage a monoculture ?

spelling typo
Source Link

If someone asks a question, and gets no answer after while, they get suggested to raise a bounty.

After a week the bounty expires.

If there was useful answer, then the OP loosesloses rep.

So the scenario is really, the OP looses rep for asking questions that nobody else is interested in.

Is this intended ? Should we encourage a monoculture ?

If someone asks a question, and gets no answer after while, they get suggested to raise a bounty.

After a week the bounty expires.

If there was useful answer, then the OP looses rep.

So the scenario is really, the OP looses rep for asking questions that nobody else is interested in.

Is this intended ? Should we encourage a monoculture ?

If someone asks a question, and gets no answer after while, they get suggested to raise a bounty.

After a week the bounty expires.

If there was useful answer, then the OP loses rep.

So the scenario is really, the OP looses rep for asking questions that nobody else is interested in.

Is this intended ? Should we encourage a monoculture ?

edited title; edited title; edited title
Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading