Timeline for Ticket smash for [status-review] tag
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2021 at 15:24 | comment | added | Mast | @ShadowWizardisVaccinating I agree a new status tag is much more meaningful here than modifying an existing tag that has been in use for a decade. | |
| Feb 21, 2021 at 9:05 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | @goldPseudo good point about past usage, but still, not sure it justifies whole new status tag. Worth a new discussion, feel free to start one. :) | |
| Feb 21, 2021 at 8:54 | history | edited | goldPseudo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added alternative
|
| Feb 21, 2021 at 8:47 | comment | added | goldPseudo | @ShadowWizardisVaccinating Changing the wiki to reflect the current usage is fine, but you also have to consider all the existing questions that are already tagged with status-declined under the original definition. If going that route, it would make more sense to create an entirely new tag (status-somedaymaybe?) than to double-load the existing one. | |
| Feb 21, 2021 at 8:28 | comment | added | Luuklag | meta.stackexchange.com/questions/361140/… here another reply is from Des, explaining their plans. | |
| Feb 21, 2021 at 8:26 | comment | added | Luuklag | This. Exactly this! I made comments about this as well, but got no satisfactory response there. | |
| Feb 21, 2021 at 8:26 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | No, what I have in mind is taking the canonical "Based on our current roadmap, this isn't work that we will take on, as it doesn't coincide with functional areas that we plan to improve in the near future" they now post on the rejected bugs/requests and using it in the wiki somehow, but I'm not sure of the proper wording yet, plus it might be bigger than me. (i.e. better done by SE staff.) | |
| Feb 21, 2021 at 8:00 | comment | added | goldPseudo | @ShadowWizardisVaccinating I disagree, mostly because right now, "declined" is clearly defined, and changing it to mean "declined and/or deferred, but not really deferred-deferred" just adds ambiguity to both tags rather than removes any. | |
| Feb 21, 2021 at 7:03 | comment | added | Shadow Wizard | While I agree, maybe it is better to update the tag wiki to reflect the current situation. | |
| Feb 21, 2021 at 3:28 | history | answered | goldPseudo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |