Skip to main content
Meta Stack Exchange

Return to Answer

Used more standard formatting (we have italics and bold on this platform).
Source Link
This_is_NOT_a_forum
This_is_NOT_a_forum
  • 6.7k
  • 4
  • 37
  • 55

What should be changed

Can something be done to create a process for graduating beta sites or change the process (if it isn’t in progress already). There are a lot of very healthy beta sites that:

  • cannot crash and burn. The sheer age of some beta sites should speak to this
  • Have veritable experts. Some beta sites have user(s) over 100k rep, user(s) with legendary, and user(s) with gold tag badges. These people are experts
  • have Plentyplenty of questions. For example, politics is approaching 13k questions and space exploration is approaching 16k
  • have Veryvery active moderation. Politics SE has very high moderation (from my experience)
  • Are quite interesting. As demonstrated by the link, politics hits HNQ quite often, meaning that these sites are interesting.

So, can something be changed about the graduation of beta sites?

What should be changed

Can something be done to create a process for graduating beta sites or change the process (if it isn’t in progress already). There are a lot of very healthy beta sites that:

  • cannot crash and burn. The sheer age of some beta sites should speak to this
  • Have veritable experts. Some beta sites have user(s) over 100k rep, user(s) with legendary, and user(s) with gold tag badges. These people are experts
  • have Plenty of questions. For example, politics is approaching 13k questions and space exploration is approaching 16k
  • have Very active moderation. Politics SE has very high moderation (from my experience)
  • Are quite interesting. As demonstrated by the link, politics hits HNQ quite often, meaning that these sites are interesting.

So, can something be changed about the graduation of beta sites?

What should be changed

Can something be done to create a process for graduating beta sites or change the process (if it isn’t in progress already). There are a lot of very healthy beta sites that:

  • cannot crash and burn. The sheer age of some beta sites should speak to this
  • Have veritable experts. Some beta sites have user(s) over 100k rep, user(s) with legendary, and user(s) with gold tag badges. These people are experts
  • have plenty of questions. For example, politics is approaching 13k questions and space exploration is approaching 16k
  • have very active moderation. Politics SE has very high moderation (from my experience)
  • Are quite interesting. As demonstrated by the link, politics hits HNQ quite often, meaning that these sites are interesting.

So, can something be changed about the graduation of beta sites?

Source Link
Ekadh Singh
Ekadh Singh
  • 170
  • 1
  • 9
  • 29

What should be changed

Can something be done to create a process for graduating beta sites or change the process (if it isn’t in progress already). There are a lot of very healthy beta sites that:

  • cannot crash and burn. The sheer age of some beta sites should speak to this
  • Have veritable experts. Some beta sites have user(s) over 100k rep, user(s) with legendary, and user(s) with gold tag badges. These people are experts
  • have Plenty of questions. For example, politics is approaching 13k questions and space exploration is approaching 16k
  • have Very active moderation. Politics SE has very high moderation (from my experience)
  • Are quite interesting. As demonstrated by the link, politics hits HNQ quite often, meaning that these sites are interesting.

So, can something be changed about the graduation of beta sites?