Skip to main content

Timeline for New responsive Activity page

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 9, 2021 at 17:33 comment added Caleb Capital-R Responsive design is often not actually responsive in much the same way that capital-A Agile is often not actually agile.
Dec 7, 2021 at 22:26 comment added jthill @DanCormier I didn't think, and I'm sorry I left that as a reasonable read, you'd come up with the notion yourself. But that's a beautiful example of what I meant by hijacking characterization. "A responsive design adapts the web-page layout to the viewing environment", and rather than adapting the web page layout to the viewing environment, you've adapted the web page layout to a mobile phone display regardless of what anyone's actually using. It's the opposite of responsive.
Dec 7, 2021 at 22:18 comment added Dan Cormier Staff @jthill No malice or deception intended. I'm using responsive in the sense of "responsive web design" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsive_web_design
Dec 7, 2021 at 22:17 comment added jthill @DanCormier Except you're using a perfectly private meaning of "responsive". I want to see a profile, that's the highlights, the skyline, the, you know, profile of what a user's up to, and asking for the profile used to be responsive: it showed me that. Now it's not responsive. Seriously, trying to hijack characterizations? Stop..
Dec 7, 2021 at 21:13 history edited zcoop98 CC BY-SA 4.0
Add author's note
Dec 1, 2021 at 12:46 history edited This_is_NOT_a_forum CC BY-SA 4.0
Active reading - but perhaps endash/emdash(?), without any space(?).
Nov 30, 2021 at 16:11 history edited Dan CormierStaff CC BY-SA 4.0
Adding the "status-review" tag since this is under review.
Nov 21, 2021 at 19:28 comment added Dan Cormier Staff Thank you for the thoughtful feedback! I'm inclined to agree that we've strayed too much from a summary view. This view is the product of prioritizing building a responsive layout over making the decisions of what information should and shouldn't be shown. This issue seems most apparent with the "Answers" section, where it's furthest from a summary. We'll be reconsidering how to strike the balance between this view being detailed and being easy to digest.
Nov 20, 2021 at 8:40 comment added Luuklag Yup, we should just go back to titles only for posts and answers here.
Nov 20, 2021 at 6:28 comment added 41686d6564 Couldn't agree more. We don't need all that information on the summary tab. We need to be able to evaluate several things about the user's activity by looking at one screen.
Nov 19, 2021 at 21:18 history answered zcoop98 CC BY-SA 4.0