Timeline for Your input: (Non-engineering) priorities for the community team
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2022 at 14:17 | comment | added | Philippe StaffMod | @Discretelizard - I think we located your inquiry. For some reason it was stuck in a limbo-like state for assignment. V2Blast has kicked the server, I believe, and it's shaping up and acting the way we like to see now. Someone's going to follow-up with you (i'm a little unclear who or when, but what do I know, i'm just the guy in charge, who prays that he didn't misunderstand things every time he posts a promise like that). | |
| Jan 20, 2022 at 9:31 | comment | added | Discrete lizard | @Philippe I've been asking for this for so long already... at this point I'm more interested if we can solve this problem on our own, as I mentioned, the numbers are currently improving. | |
| Jan 20, 2022 at 2:00 | comment | added | Philippe StaffMod | @animuson: it's not quite correct to say that we're graduating all sites based on not really any criteria. Rosie wrote about the criteria that were used recently at Congratulations to the 59 sites that just left Beta. The requirements to exit beta haven't actually changed that much. We dropped one (actually, it was dropped a while back) and modified another, but otherwise, basically the same. | |
| Jan 20, 2022 at 1:53 | comment | added | Philippe StaffMod | Regarding the 3 votes to close, I believe that if you raise a CM escalation, they can give you more info about how to hop on that train. I think V2Blast may be able to help out here, as well. | |
| Jan 13, 2022 at 14:01 | history | edited | Discrete lizard | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added link to yearly review
|
| Jan 4, 2022 at 19:40 | comment | added | Discrete lizard | Well, I mean roughly the middle, which seem a decent estimate. Perhaps the average is more relevant, but that doesn't differ much except for a few outliers. | |
| Jan 4, 2022 at 17:13 | comment | added | Ekadh Singh | I don't think median is the right word here, because that has a very specific math meaning. (I completely agree with the meaning of the post though). | |
| Jan 1, 2022 at 8:00 | comment | added | Discrete lizard | @animuson Yes, I agree that the process to determine the thresholds should be revisited. My main point, though, is to also apply the revision to big sites, in case it would improve their situation. | |
| Jan 1, 2022 at 1:56 | comment | added | animuson StaffMod | I would emphasize that these thresholds were based on a very specific timeline of how a site progress from private beta to a graduated site. And now that we're just "graduating" all sites based on not really any criteria, we're going to be breaking all of the standards that previously relied on those criteria being met first. I don't think the existing system of private beta, public beta, and graduated thresholds makes sense anymore. Instead, we should develop a set of 4-5 reputation "templates" that a site can choose from, and move up when they see fit via meta discussion, not based on beta. | |
| Dec 31, 2021 at 15:43 | history | edited | Discrete lizard | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
words
|
| Dec 31, 2021 at 15:40 | history | answered | Discrete lizard | CC BY-SA 4.0 |