discussion

When the community members gave feedback about Changes to answer sorting menu: moving menu, "Newest" sort option, renaming sort options, the company went back to the drawing board and came up with this Revisiting changes to answer sorting menu: better use of space, moving menu into a dropdown, ascending/descending sort options, clearer descriptions. That's nice, right?

Why cannot something similar be done for the post summary design too?

Please do not be inconsiderate. I would like to quote Zanna:

The reasons people have for maintaining and contributing to a commons are quite simple; they derive some important benefit from it, and realise that without the participation of people like them, it will not exist. I believe this is a strong motivation, both emotional and rational. Not everyone will feel the need or have the skills/time/means to contribute, but if enough do, the commons will survive and thrive

I would like to emphasize about time. Our time is valuable and without us spending time with the communities, the communities will perish. Feature changes like this anger users, make them want to use the site less and less as they have to spend more time to get used to the changes (which they don't like) being forced upon them.

Please value our time. Please value the communities.

discussion

When the community members gave feedback about Changes to answer sorting menu: moving menu, "Newest" sort option, renaming sort options, the company went back to the drawing board and came up with this Revisiting changes to answer sorting menu: better use of space, moving menu into a dropdown, ascending/descending sort options, clearer descriptions. That's nice, right?

Why cannot something similar be done for the post summary design too?

Please do not be inconsiderate. I would like to quote Zanna:

The reasons people have for maintaining and contributing to a commons are quite simple; they derive some important benefit from it, and realise that without the participation of people like them, it will not exist. I believe this is a strong motivation, both emotional and rational. Not everyone will feel the need or have the skills/time/means to contribute, but if enough do, the commons will survive and thrive

I would like to emphasise about time. Our time is valuable and without us spending time with the communities, the communities will perish. Feature changes like this anger users, make them want to use the site less and less as they have to spend more time to get used to the changes (which they don't like) being forced upon them.

Please value our time. Please value the communities.

discussion

When the community members gave feedback about Changes to answer sorting menu: moving menu, "Newest" sort option, renaming sort options, the company went back to the drawing board and came up with this Revisiting changes to answer sorting menu: better use of space, moving menu into a dropdown, ascending/descending sort options, clearer descriptions. That's nice right?

Why cannot something similar be done for the post summary design too?

Please do not be inconsiderate. I would like to quote Zanna:

The reasons people have for maintaining and contributing to a commons are quite simple; they derive some important benefit from it, and realise that without the participation of people like them, it will not exist. I believe this is a strong motivation, both emotional and rational. Not everyone will feel the need or have the skills/time/means to contribute, but if enough do, the commons will survive and thrive

I would like to emphasise about time. Our time is valuable and without we spending time with communities, communities will perish. Feature changes like this anger users, make them wanna use the site lesser and lesser as they have to spend more time to get used to the changes (which they don't like) forced upon them.

Please value our time. Please value the communities.

discussion

When the community members gave feedback about Changes to answer sorting menu: moving menu, "Newest" sort option, renaming sort options, the company went back to the drawing board and came up with this Revisiting changes to answer sorting menu: better use of space, moving menu into a dropdown, ascending/descending sort options, clearer descriptions. That's nice, right?

Why cannot something similar be done for the post summary design too?

Please do not be inconsiderate. I would like to quote Zanna:

The reasons people have for maintaining and contributing to a commons are quite simple; they derive some important benefit from it, and realise that without the participation of people like them, it will not exist. I believe this is a strong motivation, both emotional and rational. Not everyone will feel the need or have the skills/time/means to contribute, but if enough do, the commons will survive and thrive

I would like to emphasize about time. Our time is valuable and without us spending time with the communities, the communities will perish. Feature changes like this anger users, make them want to use the site less and less as they have to spend more time to get used to the changes (which they don't like) being forced upon them.

Please value our time. Please value the communities.