Timeline for Should trusted close/reopen voters and reviewers have their votes weighted more than others'?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2022 at 20:39 | comment | added | NotTheDr01ds | @Luuklag While that's true, my experience is that, unless they have a strong opinion (and expertise in the particular topic beyin addressed), they tend to "trust the community" and leave it closed. This is especially the case when there have been no edits to the question in the meantime. Something that was just "wrongfully closed" tends to stay closed. The review process encourages this by making one of the reasons, "Original close reasons were not addressed". If there were no edits, then the natural conclusion is that the close reasons weren't "addressed." | |
| Feb 13, 2022 at 20:35 | comment | added | Luuklag | You seem to focus pretty much solely on closing. But the reverse would have to be true as well. So re-opening would become easier too. | |
| Feb 13, 2022 at 20:31 | history | edited | NotTheDr01ds | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1029 characters in body
|
| Feb 13, 2022 at 20:18 | history | answered | NotTheDr01ds | CC BY-SA 4.0 |