Timeline for Statistics: Current Ratio of "Link-And-Run" on the Stack Exchange Network
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:17 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Jun 22, 2010 at 12:29 | comment | added | C. Ross | @Andrew in general yes, but in this case, the word hyperthreading is probably sufficient. Besides, do you know something about Intel I don't? | |
| Feb 3, 2010 at 8:43 | comment | added | Mark Henderson | @Zypher, no apology needed! | |
| Feb 3, 2010 at 5:28 | comment | added | Andrew Moore | And if ever the link goes dead, the answer just lost its meaning. That's why I think you should always provide a summary with your answer. | |
| Feb 3, 2010 at 4:25 | comment | added | Zypher | @Farseeker: Sorry ... brain didn't prccess the last part of your first sentence ... forgive me please. | |
| Feb 3, 2010 at 4:06 | comment | added | Mark Henderson | @Zypher, that's my point. Just because an answer is heavily link-dominated doesn't mean it's a link-and-run. And yes I meant to link to the Wikipedia page but I copied from the wrong tab, and by the time I noticed he'd already accepted the answer, so why bother | |
| Feb 3, 2010 at 2:10 | comment | added | Zypher | That's not such a good example, as the answer to the question really is just simply "hyper threading" with a link to the Intel product page to explain a little bit more (I would have linked to Wikipedia's hyper threading page personally). | |
| Feb 3, 2010 at 1:48 | history | answered | Mark Henderson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |