Timeline for How can I ask a question regarding moderator related issues if I don't have access to the Teachers' Lounge or the Stack Moderators team?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
45 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 26, 2023 at 15:17 | comment | added | Slate StaffMod | @αλεχολυτ Yes, please do if you have time to. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 15:11 | comment | added | αλεχολυτ | @Slate I did the request via contact page yesterday, you can see (I hope) record about it on moderator dashboard on ruSO. Is it really necessary to do it again but via email? | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 15:07 | comment | added | Slate StaffMod | Hey folks. While I'm grateful for the plethora of people who are doing their best to inform everyone on a need-to-know basis, I want to gently remind folks that the ultimate issue here is one only Community Managers can resolve with the tools we have available. I know how tempting it is to jump into the fray, but I'd encourage you to stay your hand as much as you can. @αλεχολυτ, if you have questions about your access to moderator tools, I would encourage you to send an email to [email protected], and we will respond as soon as we are able. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 15:04 | comment | added | Mad Scientist | @αλεχολυτ Access to PII is restricted before you accept the mod agreement, the tools are disabled. TL can contain PII, so it should have the same restrictions. They are not enforced by the system yet, but the general problem is the same. The mod agreement concerns handling PII, and you should not see PII before you accept it. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 15:02 | comment | added | aepot | @αλεχολυτ I strongly suggest to stop it. Please :) be a mod, calm that down. There's really no sense to bring that to legal-like clearance level, at least for now. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 14:58 | comment | added | αλεχολυτ | @Cerbrus where is stated that elected moderator should not have access to Teachers' Lounge prior signing the Agreement? | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 14:56 | comment | added | aepot | @Cerbrus sorry for my bad English. I agree. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 14:54 | comment | added | Cerbrus | @aepot the user wasn't suspended. He was removed from a chatroom that requires moderators to have signed the agreement. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 14:50 | comment | added | Bryan Krause | @aepot You mischaracterize what occurred, and it seems to me that this mischaracterization encourages rude behavior. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 14:42 | comment | added | aepot | @BryanKrause that was a joke if you insist. A smiley at the end of the comment ":D". Actually it was QA. TS added few strings visible only to half-mods to traducir, etc. Asked few questions, made an attention to behaviors. Was it really that bad? Nope I guess. Suspending him because he didn't sign the doc that was really signed at the moment isn't a thing to do. Are we suspending users when we not fully sure? As mod I never do that. I'm somewhat agreee with TS dissapointment. Btw, it probably didn't worth posting that publicly on MSE | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 14:34 | comment | added | Bryan Krause | @aepot The "source of the accident" is not QA, either. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 14:25 | comment | added | aepot | @BryanKrause I'm not about this post but about the source of the accident. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 14:23 | comment | added | Bryan Krause | @aepot This post is not QA. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 14:11 | comment | added | aepot | SE is programmer's resource. You did some QA. Programmers hate QA engineers and vice versa. That's it, bro. :D | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 13:44 | comment | added | Cerbrus | @HolyBlackCat I'm not sure αλεχολυτ would give an unbiased answer there... | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 13:34 | answer | added | Xander Henderson | timeline score: 31 | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 13:24 | comment | added | HolyBlackCat | I've created a post on ruSO meta. I suggest you should explain what's going on there. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 13:14 | comment | added | Cerbrus | You're not explaining. You're complaining. You're making unbased accusations of power abuse, and you're constantly arguing with people that are explaining how to fix the issue... Just sign the agreement, it's that simple. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 13:12 | comment | added | αλεχολυτ | @Cerbrus Oh my ... I'm tired to explaining it again and again. Please see here | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 13:08 | comment | added | Cerbrus | @αλεχολυτ The solution is extremely simple: Sign the moderator agreement and contact the CM team when you have signed it. I don't understand why you're complaining about losing access when you shouldn't have had access in the first place. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 13:07 | comment | added | αλεχολυτ | @HolyBlackCat your question in comment isn't relevant to the current post. I think we can discuss it in the separate more concrete Q, sorry for that. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 13:04 | comment | added | HolyBlackCat | @αλεχολυτ That doesn't explain anything. Why do you hesitate signing the agreement? | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 13:04 | comment | added | Cerbrus | I must say I don't feel very comfortable having someone that thinks access to PII is a right, not a privilege, as a moderator... You've been elected for barely a week, and you're already stirring up drama? Great start... | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 13:02 | comment | added | αλεχολυτ | @HolyBlackCat please see related post and the comment on another. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 12:55 | comment | added | ColleenV | Mods are 3rd parties, and the company warrants that they will protect PI in the privacy policy. We require all third parties to respect the security of your personal data and to treat it in accordance with the law. We do not allow our third-party service providers to use your personal data for their own purposes and only permit them to process your personal data for specified purposes and in accordance with contractual obligations which ensure adequate protection for your personal data. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 12:48 | comment | added | HolyBlackCat | Can you explain what are you doing and why are you doing it? Why don't you sign the moderator agreement? | |
S Apr 26, 2023 at 12:43 | history | edited | TinkeringbellMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
simplified title, improved grammar, included relevant bit of information from comment underneath one of the answers.
|
S Apr 26, 2023 at 12:43 | history | suggested | Elements In Space | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
simplified title, improved gramma
|
Apr 26, 2023 at 12:39 | comment | added | ColleenV | You can not have access to private information unless you've agreed to safeguard it. The fact that you did have access to those spaces where private information was shared is a serious security failure on the part of the company and I'm very disappointed if that is in fact what happened. It's very sloppy to give elevated access prior to the agreement being signed and it makes me question how well that private information is safeguarded overall. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 12:33 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Apr 26, 2023 at 12:43 | |||||
Apr 26, 2023 at 12:17 | history | edited | αλεχολυτ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 169 characters in body
|
Apr 26, 2023 at 11:57 | comment | added | αλεχολυτ | @ColleenV "You should not have access to those spaces unless you have signed the agreement." Why do you think so? Where it's stated officially (by staff)? | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 11:54 | comment | added | ColleenV | You should not have access to those spaces unless you have signed the agreement. If a mistake has been made, the only people who can resolve it are staff, and you contact them through the “contact” link at the bottom of the page. meta.stackexchange.com/contact | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 11:50 | answer | added | Mithical | timeline score: 14 | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 11:48 | comment | added | αλεχολυτ | @JourneymanGeek it's seems that your comment is based on wrong assumption. As far as I'm seeing now, the person who has an ability to deprive the rights to access to chats and to Stack Moderators, doesn't have possibility to check if mod have signed the Argeement or not. And there is a BIG problem with that. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 11:42 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | @αλεχολυτ Well - access to these resources is managed by the community team, who can see if you signed the agreement - especially teams. The community team of course has full visibility of whether you signed the moderator agreement. You did want to see what happened if a moderator delayed signing the agreement didn't you? | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 11:39 | history | edited | αλεχολυτ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 19 characters in body
|
Apr 26, 2023 at 11:39 | answer | added | Mad Scientist | timeline score: 7 | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 11:37 | comment | added | αλεχολυτ | @ColleenV what link you mean? I had access to Teachers Lounge chat and to Stack Moderators team before yesterday. When someone decided (again see my comment above) to move out me from these places. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 11:36 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Active reading [<https://meta.stackexchange.com/tags/teachers-lounge/info>]. Added some context.
|
Apr 26, 2023 at 11:33 | comment | added | ColleenV | I don’t understand what you’re trying to say. If you haven’t signed the agreement, you don’t get access to moderator-only spaces. If you have signed the agreement and don’t have access, you should use the contact link at the bottom of the page to get that resolved. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 11:29 | comment | added | αλεχολυτ | @ColleenV I'm really really curios and discouraged HOW without any proof of information about did someone signed the Agreement or doesn't signed the people can make decisions to block the access for necessary resources!? | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 10:53 | comment | added | ColleenV | If you don’t have access to moderator-only spaces, why would anyone share information with you that can only be discussed in a moderator-only space? You can always contact the company with the contact link at the bottom of every page. Also, not sure how you can violate an agreement you haven’t accepted. | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 10:48 | answer | added | Journeyman GeekMod | timeline score: 15 | |
Apr 26, 2023 at 10:33 | history | asked | αλεχολυτ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |