Timeline for Why has only a minority of SE moderators indicated their support for the "strike"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2023 at 12:02 | comment | added | terdon | @prusswan we did not ask to negotiate, the company did. And we tried very hard for many weeks to convince the company that its new policy and approach would harm the sites we love. They didn't hear us. The strike is a desperate, last ditch effort to salvage the SE network, a part of Stack Overflow Inc. collection of products that the company has almost entirely ignored for years because it doesn't make significant money from it. Once we started the strike and got some stories in the press, then the company sent representatives and asked for negotiations. | |
| Jul 1, 2023 at 5:09 | comment | added | prusswan | at the same time, a business would not want to be threatened by volunteers that would ask to "negotiate". The volunteers may not see it this way, but business is busineess | |
| Jun 30, 2023 at 19:02 | comment | added | Philippos | Great! You have a good reason not to join the strike, but you understand it. And even though you don't share the opinion of most mods on the current trigger subject, you agree that the way SE Inc. is treating their community needs to improve. It's voices like yours we need. This is not about some AI rules anymore, it's about miscommunication and destroying the best this site had. | |
| Jun 30, 2023 at 16:50 | history | edited | ouflak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Jun 30, 2023 at 16:42 | history | edited | ouflak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 99 characters in body
|
| Jun 30, 2023 at 16:34 | history | answered | ouflak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |