Timeline for spam prevention mechanism - earn 10 reputation to post more hyperlinks no more
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Feb 17, 2010 at 9:53 | comment | added | cregox | Sure, why not? I got the idea on separating some things, but other things would fit better linked together. I'm great for spotting those system issues, not being able to explain myself and seeing it evolve to fixing it later on. Eventually I'll learn how to better use this ability, or just drop it. | |
| Feb 17, 2010 at 9:23 | comment | added | pavium | You may have noticed that 'questions' on Meta are voted up or down according to whether people agree with what you say. On the SO/SU/SF sites it more or less depends on technical merit. Most of your contributions to Meta have been downvoted. Would you really want to lose reputation on the other sites because you've said some unpopular things? | |
| Feb 17, 2010 at 6:42 | comment | added | cregox | I did associate. If it would be misleading, thing I haven't thought at first, then just share enough rep, or whatever other kind of measure, so I can be considered not-spammer from just one. I mean, c'mon, this is highly frustrating! | |
| Feb 17, 2010 at 5:14 | history | edited | pavium | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
more detail
|
| Feb 17, 2010 at 5:05 | history | edited | pavium | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
more detail
|
| Feb 17, 2010 at 5:02 | comment | added | random | Needs 200 rep on one account for the bonus. | |
| Feb 17, 2010 at 4:59 | history | answered | pavium | CC BY-SA 2.5 |