Timeline for Our partnership with Google and commitment to socially responsible AI
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12 at 7:56 | comment | added | Ellie K | @This_is_NOT_a_forum Nicely done. I felt the usual sorrow at your first link, but smiled a bit from the second. (I haven't seen the movie yet. There's already a sequel so I should do both as a double feature.) | |
| Mar 11 at 21:48 | comment | added | This_is_NOT_a_forum | Re "obsoleted their own": The list is long and distinguished! | |
| Mar 11 at 21:47 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Active reading [<https://policies.stackoverflow.co/company/trademark-guidance/#h1-2de2438a74fa0>]. Added some context.
|
| Mar 11 at 21:17 | comment | added | guest271314 | It's possible. I don't use "A.I.". Google Search worked for many years without claiming "A.I." had anything to do with the algorithm. If the idea is really just searching, just use Google Search. However, the idea is to squeeze all they can out of the trending "A.I." nonsense. | |
| Mar 9 at 9:34 | history | edited | user1477137 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed a statement
|
| Mar 9 at 7:09 | history | edited | user1477137 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
update
|
| Mar 9 at 7:04 | comment | added | Petəíŕd the Wizard | When SE applied AI, things went down. And IMO, SE went too far with AI. So I'd suggest SE to refrain using AI, but that's almost impossible now... | |
| Mar 8 at 18:12 | history | answered | user1477137 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |